This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Cost-effectiveness of agri-environmental payment programs

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Thilo W. Glebe () (Environmental Economics and Agricultural Policy Group, Technical University of Munich)
Abstract

The cost-effectiveness of agri-environmental auctions soliciting two-dimensional bids consisting of conservation activity and compensation payment is analyzed. Taking a selfselecting contract schedule as a benchmark, an optimally designed auction has the potential to reduce government expenditures significantly. However, the relative cost-effectiveness of a bidding process is determined by the bid scoring system. If the government imposes stricter environmental restrictions to farmers with lower compliance costs, a bid ranking system adding scores for environmental performance and financial demands is more cost-effective than an index calculating the ratio between proposed compensation payments and environmental program benefits.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Technische Universität München, Environmental Economics and Agricultural Policy Group in its series Discussion Papers with number 032006.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 19 pages
Date of creation: Mar 2006
Date of revision: 2008
Publication status: Published in European Review of Agricultural Economics. No. 35(2), 143-165. (title: Scoring two-dimensional bids: How cost-effective are agri-environmental auctions?)
Handle: RePEc:tuu:papers:032006

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Alte Akademie 14, D-85350 M�nchen
Phone: +49(0)8161 71-3406
Fax: +49(0)8161 71-3408
Web page: http://www.wzw.tum.de/ap/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Roswitha Weinbrunn).

Related research
Keywords: agri-environmental policy; auctions; conservation contracts; cost-effectiveness; information asymmetry; mechanism design;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Andrew Moxey & Ben White & Adam Ozanne, 1999. "Efficient Contract Design for Agri-Environment Policy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 50(2), pages 187-202. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Cason, Timothy N. & Gangadharan, Lata & Duke, Charlotte, 2003. "A laboratory study of auctions for reducing non-point source pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 446-471, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Thomas L. Marsh, 2005. "Economic substitution for US wheat food use by class *," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd., vol. 49(3), pages 283-301, 09. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Gary Stoneham & Vivek Chaudhri & Arthur Ha & Loris Strappazzon, 2003. "Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd., vol. 47(4), pages 477-500, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Wu, JunJie & Babcock, Bruce A., 1996. "Contract Design for the Purchase of Environmental Goods from Agriculture," Staff General Research Papers 1050, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  6. Rob Hart, 2005. "Combating moral hazard in agri-environmental schemes: a multiple-agent approach," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press for the Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 75-91, March.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can use IDEAS to provide links to papers and articles in your course syllabus.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-14.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.