Advanced Search

The Market For Audit Services And S&P 500 Index Clients

Contents:

Author Info

  • Sharad Asthana

    (The University of Texas at San Antonio)

  • Rachana Kalelkar

    (The University of Texas at San Antonio)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Literature on S&P 500 index firms shows that there is significant improvement in the performance due to increased scrutiny of media and investors. Recently Platikonova (2008) documents improvement in the disclosure quality for firms following their inclusion in the index. Since, auditors are responsible for certifying the quality of reporting and the audit fee reflects their perception of earnings quality, we examine whether the improvement in the reporting due to S&P scrutiny is reflected in audit fees. Our analysis shows that audit fees are significantly lower for S&P firms. This suggests that auditors believe that the quality of reporting improves for firms when they enter S&P index. Our further investigation shows that this reduction in fees is higher for firms that stay in the index for longer time. This shows that auditors consider the time length of a firm in the index while providing the discount. Lastly, we find that expert auditor to less likely lowball their fees for S&P clients. In fact we find expert auditors to charge higher fees for auditing S&P firms. Overall we conclude that S&P index scrutiny not only improves firm’s performance but also improves firms reporting.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://business.utsa.edu/wps/acc/0022ACC-501-2010pdf
    Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Eddie Salinas)
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio in its series Working Papers with number 0022.

    Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
    Length: 37 pages
    Date of creation:
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0022

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 6900 North Loop 1604 West, San Antonio, TX 78249-0631
    Phone: 210.458.4313
    Fax: 210.458.4308
    Web page: http://business.utsa.edu/wps
    More information through EDIRC

    For corrections or technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Eddie Salinas).

    Related research

    Keywords: S&P index; Auditors; Audit Fee; Client Risk; Earnings Quality; Industry Experts; Influential Clients;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    1. Holthausen, Robert W. & Watts, Ross L., 2001. "The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 3-75, September.
    2. Wayne R. Landsman, 2002. "Has the Information Content of Quarterly Earnings Announcements Declined in the Past Three Decades?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 797-808, 06.
    3. Collins, Daniel W. & Maydew, Edward L. & Weiss, Ira S., 1997. "Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 39-67, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsa:wpaper:0022

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eddie Salinas).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.