This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Is the veil of ignorance only a concept about risk? An experiment Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Hannah Hörisch () (University of Munich, Seminar for Economic Theory, Ludwigstraße 28 (Rgb.), 80539 Munich, Germany, email: hannah.hoerisch@lrz.uni-muenchen.de.)
We implement the Rawlsian veil of ignorance in the laboratory. Our experimental design allows separating the effects of risk and social preferences behind the veil of ignorance. Subjects prefer more equal distributions behind than in front of the veil of ignorance, but only a minority acts according to maximin preferences. Men prefer more equal allocations mostly for insurance purposes, women also due to social preferences for equality. Our results contrast the Utilitarian's claim that behind the veil of ignorance maximin preferences necessarily imply infinite risk aversion. They are compatible with any degree of risk aversion as long as social preferences for equality are sufficiently strong.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Paper provided by SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich in its series Discussion Papers with number
230.
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Feb 2008Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:trf:wpaper:230Contact details of provider: Postal: D-68131 Mannheim Fax: +49 621 181-2785 Email: Web page: http://www.sfbtr15.de/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Claudia Jung).
Keywords: deterrence ; law and economics ; incentives ; crowding out ; experiment ; Other versions of this item:
Find related papers by JEL classification: D64 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Altruism C99 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Other D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports :
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: Dirk Engelmann & Martin Strobel, 2004.
"Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 94(4), pages 857-869, September.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: John C. Harsanyi, 1953.
"Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking ,"
Journal of Political Economy ,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 61, pages 434.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
James Andreoni & Lise Vesterlund, 2001.
"Which Is The Fair Sex? Gender Differences In Altruism ,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics ,
MIT Press, vol. 116(1), pages 293-312, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Johannesson, Magnus & Gerdtham, Ulf-G, 1995.
"A Pilot Test of Using the Veil of Ignorance Approach to Estimate a Social Welfare Function for Income ,"
Applied Economics Letters ,
Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 2(10), pages 400-402, October.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Raymond Fisman & Shachar Kariv & Daniel Markovits, 2007.
"Individual Preferences for Giving ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1858-1876, December.
[Downloadable!]
David Dickinson & J. Tiefenthaler, .
"What is fair? Experimental evidence ,"
Working Papers
2000-04, Utah State University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Bolton, Gary E. & Katok, Elena, 1995.
"An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior ,"
Economics Letters ,
Elsevier, vol. 48(3-4), pages 287-292, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Eckel, Catherine C & Grossman, Philip J, 1998.
"Are Women Less Selfish Than Men? Evidence from Dictator Experiments ,"
Economic Journal ,
Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(448), pages 726-35, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Lucy F. Ackert & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Mark Rider, 2004.
"Tax policy design in the presence of social preferences: some experimental evidence ,"
Working Paper
2004-33, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Fredrik Carlsson & Dinky Daruvala & Olof Johansson-Stenman, 2005.
"Are People Inequality-Averse, or Just Risk-Averse? ,"
Economica ,
London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 72(3), pages 375-396, 08.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1999.
"A Theory Of Fairness, Competition, And Cooperation ,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics ,
MIT Press, vol. 114(3), pages 817-868, August.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, .
"A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation ,"
IEW - Working Papers
iewwp004, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - IEW.
[Downloadable!] Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 1998.
"A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation ,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
1812, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 2006.
"The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism - Experimental Evidence and New Theories ,"
Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism ,
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 2005.
"The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories ,"
Discussion Papers in Economics
726, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!] Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 2005.
"The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories ,"
Discussion Papers
66, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
[Downloadable!] John C. Harsanyi, 1955.
"Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility ,"
Journal of Political Economy ,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 63, pages 309.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
F. Carlsson & G. Gupta & O. Johansson-Stenman, 2003.
"Choosing from behind a veil of ignorance in India ,"
Applied Economics Letters ,
Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 10(13), pages 825-827, October.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Steven R. Beckman & Buhong Zheng & John P. Formby & W. James Smith, 2002.
"Envy, malice and Pareto efficiency: An experimental examination ,"
Social Choice and Welfare ,
Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 349-367.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
James Andreoni & John Miller, 2002.
"Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism ,"
Econometrica ,
Econometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 737-753, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Olof Johansson-Stenman & Fredrik Carlsson & Dinky Daruvala, 2002.
"Measuring Future Grandparents" Preferences for Equality and Relative Standing ,"
Economic Journal ,
Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(479), pages 362-383, April.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full
references
Access and
download statistics Did you know? To receive notification of recent additions to the database, subscribe to the free NEP reports .
This page was last updated on 2009-12-1.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .