We study a screening game in a competitive insurance market, in which insurance customers differ with respect to both accident probability and degree of risk aversion. It is shown that indifference curves of customers in different risk classes cross exactly twice: thus the single crossing property does not hold. The existence of a unique reactive equilibrium is demonstrated. This equilibrium may be markedly different from the Pareto-dominant separating equilibrium that exists when single crossing holds. In particular, types may be pooled in equilibrium, so that cross-subsidization occurs. Moreover, insurance firms can earn positive expected profit in equilibrium, despite the usual assumption of Bertrand-like price-competition among firms. We study the implications of the model for the efficiency of market equilibrium and for the effects of rate-of-return regulation of insurance firms.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Toronto, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
msmart-96-01.
Find related papers by JEL classification: D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)