IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tiu/tiucen/6c01c9d1-d42a-46e1-916d-d45a80d73f8d.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Compromise Solutions for Bankruptcy Situations with References

Author

Listed:
  • Pulido, M.
  • Borm, P.E.M.

    (Tilburg University, Center For Economic Research)

  • Hendrickx, R.L.P.

    (Tilburg University, Center For Economic Research)

  • Llorca, N.
  • Sánchez-Soriano, J.

Abstract

This paper deals with bankruptcy situations in which in addition to the claims, an exogenously given reference point for the allocation of the estate is present.We introduce and analyse two types of compromise solutions and show that they coincide with the T value of two corresponding TU games.We apply our solutions to a real-life case of allocating university money to degree courses.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another ver
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Pulido, M. & Borm, P.E.M. & Hendrickx, R.L.P. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J., 2003. "Compromise Solutions for Bankruptcy Situations with References," Discussion Paper 2003-36, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:tiu:tiucen:6c01c9d1-d42a-46e1-916d-d45a80d73f8d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/545135/36.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Driessen, T.S.H. & Tijs, S.H., 1985. "The t-value, the core and semiconvex games," Other publications TiSEM 016b6b5d-a476-44ca-bd05-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Manuel Pulido & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano & Natividad Llorca, 2002. "Game Theory Techniques for University Management: An Extended Bankruptcy Model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 129-142, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giménez Gómez, José M. (José Manuel) & Osório, António (António Miguel) & Peris, Josep E., 2014. "Compromise solutions for bankruptcy situations: a note," Working Papers 2072/237592, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    2. E. Calvo & E. Gutiérrez, 1996. "A prekernel characterization by means of stability properties," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 4(2), pages 257-267, December.
    3. Jens Leth Hougaard & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Lars Peter Østerdal, 2010. "Baseline Rationing," Discussion Papers 10-16, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    4. Calleja, Pedro & Borm, Peter & Hendrickx, Ruud, 2005. "Multi-issue allocation situations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 730-747, August.
    5. Cano-Berlanga, Sebastián & Giménez-Gómez, José-Manuel & Vilella, Cori, 2017. "Enjoying cooperative games: The R package GameTheory," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 305(C), pages 381-393.
    6. Vito Fragnelli & Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska, 2019. "Rationing methods for allocating the European Union’s rural development funds in Poland," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 36(1), pages 295-322, April.
    7. R. Brânzei & E. Iñarra & S. Tijs & J. M. Zarzuelo, 2005. "Cooperation by Asymmetric Agents in a Joint Project," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 7(4), pages 623-640, October.
    8. Min Ji & Sai Liu & Xiaolin Zhang & Keke Cao & T. C. E. Cheng, 2017. "Sequencing Games with Slack Due Windows and Group Technology Considerations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(2), pages 121-133, February.
    9. Timoner, Pere & Izquierdo, Josep M., 2016. "Rationing problems with ex-ante conditions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 46-52.
    10. Branzei, Rodica & Dimitrov, Dinko & Tijs, Stef, 2004. "Hypercubes and compromise values for cooperative fuzzy games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 733-740, June.
    11. Hinojosa Ramos, Miguel Ángel & López Sánchez, Ana Dolores, 2011. "Regla de reparto proporcional con referencias múltiples: aplicación al caso de agregación y actualización de probabilidades || A Proportional Rule for the Division Problems with Multiple References: A," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 12(1), pages 65-80, December.
    12. René Brink & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2017. "The reverse TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 449-465, July.
    13. Acosta-Vega, Rick K. & Algaba, Encarnación & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquín, 2023. "Design of water quality policies based on proportionality in multi-issue problems with crossed claims," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 777-788.
    14. Lotty E. Westerink‐Duijzer & Loe P. J. Schlicher & Marieke Musegaas, 2020. "Core Allocations for Cooperation Problems in Vaccination," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1720-1737, July.
    15. B. Dietzenbacher & A. Estévez-Fernández & P. Borm & R. Hendrickx, 2021. "Proportionality, equality, and duality in bankruptcy problems with nontransferable utility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 301(1), pages 65-80, June.
    16. Zhang, Ranran & Ma, Weimin & Si, Hongyun & Liu, Jinjin & Liao, Le, 2021. "Cooperative game analysis of coordination mechanisms under fairness concerns of a green retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2021. "Aggregator operators for dynamic rationing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 682-691.
    18. Rick K. Acosta-Vega & Encarnaci'on Algaba & Joaqu'in S'anchez-Soriano, 2022. "On proportionality in multi-issue problems with crossed claims," Papers 2202.09877, arXiv.org.
    19. Calleja, P. & Borm, P.E.M. & Hendrickx, R.L.P., 2001. "Multi-Issue Allocation Games," Discussion Paper 2001-30, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    20. O. Palancı & S. Z. Alparslan Gök & M. O. Olgun & G.-W. Weber, 2016. "Transportation interval situations and related games," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 119-136, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bankruptcy; allocation; t-value; games;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tiu:tiucen:6c01c9d1-d42a-46e1-916d-d45a80d73f8d. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard Broekman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://center.uvt.nl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.