Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The Landscape of landscape values

Contents:

Author Info

  • Holstein, Fredrik
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The overall aim of this thesis is to clarify relations between the value perspective of economics and other value perspectives and its significance for the interpretation of normative statements and of anomalies found in stated preference (SP) surveys. The thesis contains two papers. The main objective of the first paper is to analyse and clarify the conceptual relations between different value-related terms. It is concluded that economic values has a clear meaning whereas other terms, often used to describe, and to motivate the preservation of, pastoral landscapes, have unclear normative implications. The economic concept of values is, in a sense, complete. Once the perspective is adopted it embraces, conceptually, all values of the pastoral landscape. With a specific interpretation of e.g. biological values these are conceptually included in the economic values. Other interpretations of biological values imply, on the other hand, perspectives of values that make economic values redundant. In the second paper the value perspective of economics is accepted as a normative assumption for economic analyses. Instead, the theoretical analysis in the paper focuses on the possible diverging value perspectives among respondents in SP-surveys. The aim of the paper is to suggest a framework for interpretation of people’s value expressions and to analyse if this framework can explain some of the anomalies found in stated preference surveys. It is suggested that people may hold values that can be interpreted as opinions about how initial rights should be distributed and that such opinions cannot be interpreted as ordinary preferences. If a stated preference survey implies a right that is incompatible with the right asserted by a respondent this may very well hinder the formation and expression of preferences. It is concluded that this incompatibility between implied and asserted rights, in many cases, can explain anomalies. This conclusion emphasizes e.g. the importance of the choice between WTP- and WTA-measures in stated preference surveys.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://pub.epsilon.slu.se/1100/
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics in its series Department of Economics publications with number 1100.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: Apr 2006
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:sua:ekonwp:1100

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Box 7013, 750 07 UPPSALA
    Phone: 018-67 1724
    Fax: 018-67 3502
    Web page: http://www.slu.se/ekonomi
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sua:ekonwp:1100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alejandro Engelmann).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.