Innovation in Norwegian industries – testing a new taxonomy
AbstractRecent innovation literature has emphasised several aspects in company innovation processes: Innovation processes are systemic, innovation processes are market-specific, learning plays an important role in innovation and technological change is a major issue in innovation and economic development processes. This paper introduces a company classification rooted in these dimensions. We divide industries by engineer density (high/low) and probability to have innovation collaboration (high/low). This gives us four industry groups; • Systemic industries (low engineering intensity, often innovation collaboration), • Craft-based industries (low engineering, less often collaboration), • Complex technological systems industries (high engineering, less often collabo-ration) and • Research-oriented industries (high engineering, less often collaboration). Using these groups as independent variable, we investigate variation in innovative activity (process vs products, innovation barriers, innovation objectives, ICT orientation, R&D intensity etc.) The Norwegian economy is dominated by systemic industries; about 50 percent of the private sector employees work in such industries. For these industries, we find that there are indications of a relation between size and innovativity. We also find that systemic innovators tend to have in general lower expenditure costs than for example craft-based industries, but slightly higher innovation rates. Systemic industries have more often more informal innovation processes, with the exception of one (Mining). These industries tend to be low on the process innovation axis, but quite spread on the product innovation axis.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy in its series STEP Report series with number 200206.
Date of creation:
Date of revision:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading lists or Wikipedia pages:Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nils Henrik Solum) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Nils Henrik Solum to update the entry or send us the correct address.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.