This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Market masculinities and electronic trading

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Matthias Klaes (Centre for Economic Research, Keele University, England)
Geoff Lightfoot (Centre for Philosophy and Political Economy, University of Leicester, England)
Simon Lilley (Centre for Philosophy and Political Economy, University of Leicester, England)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The transition from exchange mediated by the technology of open outcry to that mediated more entirely by screen might be expected to alter the pronounced gendering of trading. Focusing on narrative repertoires of alternative trading regimes we examine how traders make sense of their activities at the same time as practically orienting them and argue that compared to the widely acknowledged masculinity of open outcry trading, screen based trading provides no less of an arena for expression of compulsory masculinity. Methodologically, we call for greater attention to ethnographically grounded analyses of the gendered repertoires of exchange.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sceme.org.uk/wps/SCEME014_KlaesLilleyLightfoot_2007.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by SCEME in its series SCEME Working Papers: Advances in Economic Methodology with number 014/2007.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 17 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sti:wpaper:014/2007

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.sceme.org.uk/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Matthias Klaes).

Related research
Keywords: behavioral-finance; feminist-economics; gender; narrative;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Institutional; Evolutionary
B54 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Feminist Economics
G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Social Norms and Social Capital; Social Networks Economic Anthropology

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Pagano, Marco & Roell, Ailsa, 1996. " Transparency and Liquidity: A Comparison of Auction and Dealer Markets with Informed Trading," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 51(2), pages 579-611, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Daniel Beunza & David Stark, 2004. "Tools of the trade: the socio-technology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 369-400, April.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by providing information about publications in your institution.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.