Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The geography of inequalities in Europe

Contents:

Author Info

  • Philippe Martin

Abstract

This paper analyses some of the theoretical and empirical arguments that serve to legitimate regional policies in Europe. We start by reviewing the existing evidence that European integration has led to a process of convergence between countries but not between regions inside countries and suggest some mechanisms through which this can happen. Taking the example of France, we show that in the past twenty years regional divergence in production has indeed occurred. However, the geography of incomes has, during the same period, become more equal producing a “scissors effect” between the geographies of production and income. This suggests that transfers, which have nothing to do with regional policies, have, at least in France, more than compensated the increase in production inequality. Hence, “regional convergence” is not a synonym of “regional cohesion” at least at the national level. We then review evidence on a possible trade-off between growth and regional inequalities to suggest that efficiency motives can not easily be used to defend regional policies. Both evidence and theory suggest that regional concentration leads to efficiency gains. This also implies that the EU is faced with a choice it has tried to avoid until now. Either, it puts its effort in slowing or even reversing the process of spatial economic concentration at the national level or it concentrates on policies to speed up the convergence process between poor and rich countries. Finally, we analyse the relation between spatial and social inequalities. We report empirical evidence for Europe that suggests a strong empirical relation between the two: even after controlling for transfers and other possible determinants of individual inequalities, we find that countries with more regional inequalities are also those with more individual inequalities.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/9283/resources/ebe4c456.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Sciences Po in its series Sciences Po publications with number info:hdl:2441/9283.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 2005
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in Swedish Economic Policy Review, 2005, pp.83-108
Handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/9283

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.sciencespo.fr/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Economic geography; regional inequalities; regional subsidies;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Martin, Philippe, 1998. "Public Policies, Regional Inequalities and Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 1841, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  2. Antonio Ciccone & Robert E. Hall, 1995. "Productivity and the density of economic activity," Economics Working Papers, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra 120, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
  3. Gilles Duranton & Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2002. "Mind the Gaps: The Evolution of Regional Earnings Inequalities in the U.K., 1982-1997," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 219-256.
  4. Martin, Philippe & Rogers, Carol Ann, 1994. "Industrial Location and Public Infrastructure," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 909, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  5. Fuest, Clemens & Huber, Bernd, 2000. "Why do governments subsidise investment and not employment?," Munich Reprints in Economics, University of Munich, Department of Economics 20295, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
  6. Karen Helene Midelfart-Knarvik & Henry G. Overman, 2002. "Delocation and European integration: is structural spending justified?," Economic Policy, CEPR;CES;MSH, CEPR;CES;MSH, vol. 17(35), pages 321-359, October.
  7. J.A. Duro, 2004. "Regional Income Inequalities in Europe: An Updated Measurement and Some Decomposition Results," Working Papers, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona wpdea0411, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
  8. Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg & Rebecca Henderson, 1992. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," NBER Working Papers 3993, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  9. Matthieu Crozet & Pamina Koenig, 2005. "The Cohesion vs Growth Tradeoff - Evidence from EU Regions (1980-2000)," ERSA conference papers ersa05p716, European Regional Science Association.
  10. Ciccone, Antonio, 2002. "Agglomeration effects in Europe," European Economic Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 213-227, February.
  11. Laurent Davezies, 1999. "Un essai de mesure de la contribution des budgets des pays membres à la cohésion européenne," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, Programme National Persée, vol. 138(2), pages 179-196.
  12. Fuest, Clemens & Huber, Bernd, 2000. "Why do governments subsidise investment and not employment?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 78(1-2), pages 171-192, October.
  13. Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2003. "Union Retreat and Regional Economic Performance: the UK in the 1990s," Urban/Regional, EconWPA 0302006, EconWPA.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Longhi, C. & Musolesi, A. & Baumont, C., 2013. "Modeling the industrial dynamics of the European metropolitan areas during the process of economic integration: a semiparametric approach," Working Papers, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL) 2013-10, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/9283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Spire @ Sciences Po Library).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.