IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/snd/wpaper/70.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Health Benefits from Air Pollution Reduction in Kathmandu Valley

Author

Listed:
  • Naveen Adhikari

Abstract

The study estimates the health benefits to individuals from a reduction in current air pollution levels to a safe level in the Kathmandu metropolitan and Lalitpur sub-metropolitan areas of the Kathmandu valley, Nepal. The study estimates a dose response function to capture the health effects of exposure to air pollution for the purpose of measuring the monetary benefits of reducing pollution to safe levels. Data for this study was collected over four seasons from 120 households (641 individuals) from three different locations in the study area. The findings suggest that the annual welfare gain to a representative individual in the city from a reduction in air pollution from the current average level of 255 g/m3 to a safe minimum level of 120 g/m3 is NRs 266 per annum (USD 3.70). Extrapolating to the total population of the two cities of Kathmandu and Lalitpur, a reduction in air pollution to meet safety standards would result in monetary benefits of NRs 315 million (USD 4.37 million) per year. A calculation of the health benefits that would accrue to the residents of the cities under consideration yields a discounted benefit that is as high as NRs 6085 million (USD 80.53 million) for the next 20 years.Key Words: Air Pollution, Human Health, Dose Response Function, Panel Data, Health Diary

Suggested Citation

  • Naveen Adhikari, "undated". "Measuring Health Benefits from Air Pollution Reduction in Kathmandu Valley," Working papers 70, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:snd:wpaper:70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sandeeonline.org/uploads/documents/publication/983_PUB_Working_Paper_69_Naveen_Adhikari.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Karaivanov, 2009. "Heterogeneity, returns to scale, and collective action," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 42(2), pages 771-807, May.
    2. Kant, Shashi, 2000. "A dynamic approach to forest regimes in developing economies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 287-300, February.
    3. Holden, Stein T. & Shiferaw, Bekele & Wik, Mette, 1998. "Poverty, market imperfections and time preferences: of relevance for environmental policy?," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 105-130, February.
    4. E. Somanathan & R. Prabhakar & B.S. Mehta, 2002. "Collective action for forest conservation: Does heterogeneity matter?," Discussion Papers 02-01, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    5. Marc Jacobson & Joel De Castro & Vianca Aliaga & Julio Romero & MAllison Davis, 1998. "The Role of Tenure Security and Private Time Preference in Neotropical Deforestation," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 74(2), pages 162-170.
    6. Adger, W. Neil & Luttrell, Cecilia, 2000. "Property rights and the utilisation of wetlands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 75-89, October.
    7. Edella Schlager & Elinor Ostrom, 1992. "Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 68(3), pages 249-262.
    8. Dayton-Johnson, Jeff, 2000. "Determinants of collective action on the local commons: a model with evidence from Mexico," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 181-208, June.
    9. Salvatore Di Falco & Charles Perrings, 2003. "Crop Genetic Diversity, Productivity and Stability of Agroecosystems. A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 50(2), pages 207-216, May.
    10. Pranab Bardhan, 1993. "Symposium on Management of Local Commons," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 87-92, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanaullah Panezai & Ubaid Ali & Alam Zeb & Muhammad Rafiq & Ayat Ullah & Shahab E. Saqib, 2021. "Quantifying the Health and Wealth Benefits of Reducing Point Source Pollution: The Case of the Sugar Industry in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Malla, Sunil, 2013. "Household energy consumption patterns and its environmental implications: Assessment of energy access and poverty in Nepal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 990-1002.
    3. Radosław Miśkiewicz, 2020. "Efficiency of Electricity Production Technology from Post-Process Gas Heat: Ecological, Economic and Social Benefits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Helen Hoka Osiolo & Peter Kimuyu, 2017. "Demand for Indoor Air Pollution Abatement Interventions," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Gupta, Shivani & Das, Sukanya & Murty, M. N., 2019. "Quantifying Air Pollution Vulnerability and its Distributional Consequences: Some Perspectives from Delhi," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 2(01), January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yamini Gupt, "undated". "Is the Deposit Refund System for Lead Batteries in Delhi and the National Capital Region Effective?," Working papers 68, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    2. Ridhima Gupta, "undated". "Causes of Emissions from Agricultural Residue Burning in North-west India: Evaluation of a Technology Policy Response," Working papers 66, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    3. Prasenjit Sarkhel, "undated". "Examining Private Participation in Embankment Maintenance in the Indian Sundarbans," Working papers 75, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    4. Kalyan Das, "undated". "Farm Productivity Loss due to Flood-Induced Sand Deposition: A Study in Dhemaji, India," Working papers 73, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    5. Rucha Ghate & Suresh Ghate & Elinor Ostrom, "undated". "Indigenous Communities, Cooperation, and Communication: Taking Experiments to the Field," Working papers 64, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    6. Kanupriya Gupta, "undated". "Consumer Responses to Incentive to Reduce Plastic Bag Use: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Urban India," Working papers 65, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    7. Priya Shyamsundar & Rucha Ghate, "undated". "Rights, Responsibilities and Resources: Examining Community Forestry in South Asia," Working papers 59, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    8. Bhim Adhikari, 2007. "Property Rights and Natural Resources: Socio-Economic Heterogeneity and Distributional Implications of Common Property Resource Management," Working Papers id:840, eSocialSciences.
    9. Bhim Adhikari & Jon Lovett, 2006. "Institutions and collective action: Does heterogeneity matter in community-based resource management?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 426-445.
    10. Asha Gunawardena & Kanchana Wickramasinghe, "undated". "Targeting and Distribution of Post-Tsunami Aid in Sri Lanka : A Critical Appraisal," Working papers 55, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    11. Nasima Tanveer Chowdhury, "undated". "The Relative Efficiency of Water Use in Bangladesh Agriculture," Working papers 49, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    12. Rucha Ghate, "undated". "Joint Forest management, Role of Communication, and Harvesting Behavior: Evidence from Field Experiments in India," Working papers 53, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    13. Gunatilake, H.M & Wickramasinghe, W.A.R & Abeygunawardena, P., 2009. "Time Preference and Natural Resource Use by Local Communities: The Case of Sinharaja Forest in Sri Lanka," Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, Sri Lanka Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA), vol. 10, pages 1-31.
    14. Godoy, R. & Kirby, K. & Wilkie, D., 2001. "Tenure security, private time preference, and use of natural resources among lowland Bolivian Amerindians," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 105-118, July.
    15. Naidu, Sirisha C., 2009. "Heterogeneity and Collective Management: Evidence from Common Forests in Himachal Pradesh, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 676-686, March.
    16. Nakano, Yuko & Otsuka, Keijiro, 2011. "Determinants of household contributions to collective irrigation management: The case of the Doho Rice Scheme in Uganda," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(5), pages 527-551, October.
    17. Nancy McCarthy & Talip Kilic, 2015. "The nexus between gender, collective action for public goods and agriculture: evidence from Malawi," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 46(3), pages 375-402, May.
    18. Martin YELKOUNI, 2004. "Gestion communautaire et forêt de Tiogo au Burkina Faso," Working Papers 200415, CERDI.
    19. klemick, Heather & Yesuf, Mahmud, 2008. "Do Discount Rates Change over Time? Experimental Evidence from Ethiopia," RFF Working Paper Series dp-08-06-efd, Resources for the Future.
    20. Torpey-Saboe, Nichole & Andersson, Krister & Mwangi, Esther & Persha, Lauren & Salk, Carl & Wright, Glenn, 2015. "Benefit Sharing Among Local Resource Users: The Role of Property Rights," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 408-418.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    air pollution; human health; dose response function; panel data; health diary;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:snd:wpaper:70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anuradhak (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.