Das Gebuehrenkonzept der DSD auf dem oekonomischen Pruefstand
Abstract
In dem vorliegenden Beitrag untersuchen wir auf der Grundlage eines statischen allgemeinen Gleichgewichtsmodells die Effizienz verschiedener Gebuehrenkonzepte einer Abfall-Management-Organisation. Diese wird von den Produzenten, die fuer die Verwertung und/oder Entsorgung der Verpackungsabfaelle per Ruecknahmeverpflichtung verantwortlich sind, beauftragt, die Sammlung, Trennung, Verwertung und Abfallbehandlung von Verpackungen zu organisieren. Die Effizienzeigenschaften sechs unterschiedlicher Gebuehrensysteme werden ueberprueft. Vergleicht man das von diesen sechs besonders zu empfehlende Gebuehrensystem mit dem aktuellen Gebuehrenkonzept der Dualen System Deutschland AG (DSD) so zeigt sich, dass die von der DSD den Produzenten auferlegten Gebuehren konzeptionell geeignet sind, die Produzenten zu einem effizienten ("gruenen") Verpackungsdesign anzuleiten; dagegen vermitteln die von der DSD an die Verwerter zu zahlenden Gebuehren den Verwertern nicht die für eine effiziente Verwertung erforderlichen pretialen Anreize.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by Universität Siegen, Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht in its series Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge with number 84-00.Length: 18 pages
Date of creation: 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sie:siegen:84-00
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Hölderlinstr. 3, D - 57068 Siegen
Phone: ++49 (0)271 740-3139
Fax: ++49 (0)271 740-2590
Email:
Web page: http://www.uni-siegen.de/fb5/vwl/research/diskussionsbeitraege/
More information through EDIRC
Related research
Keywords:Find related papers by JEL classification:
- H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
- Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2001-05-16 (All new papers)
References
References listed on IDEASPlease report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Don Fullerton & Wenbo Wu, 1996.
"Policies for Green Design,"
NBER Working Papers
5594, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Fullerton, Don & Wu, Wenbo, 1998. "Policies for Green Design," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 131-148, September.
- Fullerton Don & Kinnaman Thomas C., 1995.
"Garbage, Recycling, and Illicit Burning or Dumping,"
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,
Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 78-91, July.
- Don Fullerton & Thomas C. Kinnaman, 1996. "Garbage, Recycling, and Illicit Burning or Dumping," NBER Working Papers 4374, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Chongwoo Choe & Iain Fraser, 1997.
"An Economic Analysis of Household Waste Management,"
Working Papers
1997.11, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
- Choe, Chongwoo & Fraser, Iain, 1999. "An Economic Analysis of Household Waste Management," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 234-246, September.
- Chongwoo Choe & Iain Fraser, 1997. "An Economic Analysis of Household Waste Management," Working Papers 1997.11, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
Citations
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sie:siegen:84-00For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael Gail).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

