This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Bayesian Analysis of the Stochastic Switching Regression Model Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Maria Odejar () (Kansas State University)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

In the stochastic switching regression model, it is not known which of several alternative regression models has actually generated the observed dependent variable. This study develops Bayesian methods for estimating the parameters of this model. A difficulty with this approach in this context arises because the direct evaluation of the posterior mean is complicated and cumbersome. An alternative to direct evaluation is the use of Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. The particular methods examined here are data augmentation and Gibbs sampling, both of which use samples that are drawn from conditional distributions that are easier to derive and more feasible to sample from than the complex joint posterior distribution. The conditional distributions necessary to implement data augmentation and Gibbs sampling are derived in this study. A simulation study compares model estimates obtained using data augmentation, Gibbs sampling, and the maximum-likelihood EM algorithm. Two models are examined, a market-disequilibrium and a structural-change model. In the simulation study, special attention is given to the accuracy and bias of the researcher's prior distributions. The results suggest that data augmentation and Gibbs sampling perform similarly for all cases. When there is little or no bias in the mean of the prior distribution, the Bayesian estimates perform better than maximum-likelihood as long as the standard deviations of the regression coefficients are less than 1.0. When the standard deviations of the regression coefficients are between 1.0 and 2.0, the Bayesian and maximum-likelihood estimates are similar. With moderate bias in the prior mean, the Bayesian and maximum-likelihood estimates perform similarly. Large bias allows the maximum-likelihood method to perform better than the Bayesian estimator as long as the standard deviations of the regression coefficients are small.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/cef99/papers/odejar.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 with number 822.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 01 Mar 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:822

Contact details of provider:
Postal: CEF99, Boston College, Department of Economics, Chestnut Hill MA 02467 USA
Fax: +1-617-552-2308
Web page: http://fmwww.bc.edu/CEF99/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Beard, T Randolph & Caudill, Steven B & Gropper, Daniel M, 1991. "Finite Mixture Estimation of Multiproduct Cost Functions," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 73(4), pages 654-64, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Kon, Stanley J & Jen, Frank C, 1978. "Estimation of Time-Varying Systematic Risk and Performance for Mutual Fund Portfolios: An Application of Switching Regression," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 33(2), pages 457-75, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by encouraging others to register as authors.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-13.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.