IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/scecf9/352.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Divorce and Savings

Author

Listed:
  • Carol Scotese Lehr

    (Virginia Commonwealth University)

Abstract

This paper examines the pattern of consumption and savings when heterogeneous agents enter into marriage and have the option of dissolving the marriage if there exists no set of consumption allocations that can preserve the union. The research presents an analysis of this scenario using dynamic cooperative bargaining models of household decision making with a divorce threat point. The model will be used to examine the behavior of household savings when divorce is a possibility and may help to explain the rapid decline in household saving during the 1980s. Most existing bargaining models of household spending decisions are static and, therefore, unable to analyze the savings decision. In this paper the evolution of household savings depends upon both partners' consumption decisions as well as the income paths of each partner. If cooperation breaks down (if the value of dissolution exceeds any cooperative strategy), the couple divorces and household savings is split according to some rule between the partners. The dynamic nature of the model will allow an investigation of the path of savings in households that do not divorce relative to households that do. Since the value of the threat point changes over time as assets accumulate, both the probability of divorce and household saving will change endogenously over the lifetime of the household. This is true even when the value of other opportunities outside the marriage are constant. Of course, as the value of opportunities outside the marriage change, each partnerÍs incentive to contribute to savings changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol Scotese Lehr, 1999. "Divorce and Savings," Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 352, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sceeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.