This paper considers the evidence of “near-rationality†in household inflation expectations, as described by Akerlof, Dickens, and Perry (2000), hereafter ADP. According to ADP, the economic incentive to anticipate inflation varies from agent to agent, and as inflation falls, some agents stop trying to accurately predict inflation (“hyper-rationalâ€) and either underweight it or, in the extreme, ignore it altogether (“nearly rationalâ€). A key implication of the ADP model is that a particular rate of inflation minimizes unemployment in the long-run. In this paper, we bring the idea described by ADP to detailed survey data on household inflation expectations for the U.S. and Sweden, two countries where the existence of ADP-type near-rationality has been identified in earlier research. We find that the survey data do not, in general, support the specific form of near-rationality suggested by ADP. However, we also show that inflation expectations are not distributed across households in a smooth and continuous way. Rather, households appear to hold inflation expectations that tend to discrete, and largely fixed “focal points,†suggesting that a substantial share of both Swedish and U.S. households do not form precise inflation predictions, but instead gauge inflation prospects in rather qualitative terms. We further document that in Sweden, the combination of a low inflation environment, coupled with an inflation target, has been accompanied by a disproportionately high proportion of households reporting the expectation of no inflation, consistent with one type of “nearly rational†behavior posited by ADP. However, a similarly low inflation trend in the U.S., which does not have an explicit inflation target, reveals no such rise in the proportion of households expecting no inflation. This observation suggests that how the central bank communicates its inflation objective may influence inflation expectations independently of the inflation trend they actually pursue.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Find related papers by JEL classification: E31 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy E01 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
N. Gregory Mankiw & Ricardo Reis & Justin Wolfers, 2004.
"Disagreement about Inflation Expectations,"
NBER Chapters,
in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2003, Volume 18, pages 209-270
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!]