This paper proposes a method for estimating the probability density of a variable of interest in the presence of model ambiguity. In the first step, each candidate parametric model is estimated minimizing the Kullback-Leibler "distance" (KLD) from a reference nonparametric density estimate. Given that the KLD represents a measure of uncertainty about the true structure, in the second step, its information content is used to rank and combine the estimated models. The paper shows that the resulting parameters estimator is root-n consistent and asymptotically normally distributed. The KLD between the nonparametric and the parametric density estimates is also shown to be asymptotically normally distributed. This result leads to determining the weights in the model combination, using the distribution function of a Normal centered on the average performance of all plausible models. As such, this combination technique does not require the true structure to belong to the set of competing models and is computationally simple. I apply the proposed method to estimate the density function of daily stock returns under different phases of the business cycle. The results indicate that the double Gamma distribution is more adequate than the Gaussian distribution in modeling stock returns, and that the combination outperforms each individual candidate model both in- and out-of-sample
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Find related papers by JEL classification: C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General - - - Estimation C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods C16 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General - - - Econometric and Statistical Methods; Specific Distributions C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation and Testing
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
David F. Hendry & Michael P. Clements, 2004.
"Pooling of forecasts,"
Econometrics Journal,
Royal Economic Society, vol. 7(1), pages 1-31, 06.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
David Hendry & Michael P. Clements, 2001.
"Pooling of Forecasts,"
Economics Papers
2002-W9, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
[Downloadable!]
Francis X. Diebold & Todd A. Gunther & Anthony S. Tay, .
"Evaluating Density Forecasts,"
CARESS Working Papres
97-18, University of Pennsylvania Center for Analytic Research and Economics in the Social Sciences.
[Downloadable!]