Spectral Implications of Security Market Data for Models of Dynamic Economies
AbstractHansen and Jagannathan (1991) proposed a volatility bound for evaluating asset-pricing models that is a restriction on the volatility of a representative agentÌs intertemporal marginal rate of substitution (IMRS). We develop a generalization of their bound that (i) incorporates the serial correlation properties of return data and (ii) allows us to calculate a spectral version of the bound. That is, we develop a bound and then decompose it by frequency; this enables us to judge whether models match important aspects of the data in the long run, at business cycle frequencies, seasonal frequencies, etc. Our generalization is related to the space in which the bounding IMRS lives. Instead of specifying the bounding IMRS to be a linear combination of contemporaneous returns, we let the bounding IMRS live in a linear space of current, past and future returns. We also require the bounding IMRS to satisfy additional restrictions that resemble Euler equations. Our volatility bound not only uses the unconditional first and second moment properties of return data but also the serial correlation properties. Incorporating this additional information results in a tighter bound for two reasons. First, we impose additional orthogonality conditions on our bounding IMRS. Second, our projection is onto a larger space (current, past and future returns). We also show that the spectrum of the model IMRS must exceed the spectrum of our bounding IMRS. Using the serial correlation properties of returns (together with the mean and variance), we are able to derive the spectrum of the bounding IMRS. That is, the lower bound on the spectrum of the model IMRS is completely pinned down by asset return data. This permits a frequency-by-frequency examination of the fundamental component of the model, namely, the Euler equation that links asset returns to the IMRS. In particular, we can identify the frequencies at which an asset-pricing model does not perform well. The researcher can then decide whether or not failures at a particular set of frequencies are troubling. We illustrate our method with four asset pricing models -- time-separable CRRA preferences, state non-separable preferences (Epstein-Zin, 1989, 1991), internal habit formation (Constantinides, 1990), and external habit formation preferences (Campbell and Cochrane, 1999) -- using two data sets, annual data from 1889-1992 and quarterly data spanning 1950:1-1995:4.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2001 with number 71.
Date of creation: 01 Apr 2001
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/conference/SCE2001/SCE2001.html
More information through EDIRC
spectrum; volatility bound; asset pricing; model evaluation;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
- E32 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.