IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/scecf0/24.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparison Of Discrete And Parametric Methods For Continuous-State Dynamic Programming Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Benitez-Silva

    (Yale University)

  • John Rust

    (Yale University)

  • Gunter Hitsch

    (Yale University)

  • Giorgio Pauletto

    (University of Geneva)

  • George Hall

    (Yale University)

Abstract

This paper presents a dynamic model of the joint labor/leisure and consumption/saving decision over the life cycle. Such a dynamic model provides a framework for considering the important policy experiments related to the reforms in Social Security. We address the role of labor supply in a life cyle utility maximization model formally, building upon recent work by Low (1998), and extending the classical optimal lifetime consumption problem under uncertainty first formalized in Phelps (1962) and later in Hakansson (1970). We begin by solving the finite horizon consumption/saving problem analytically and numerically and compare the two solutions. We also simulate this benchmark model. Once the labor choice is considered, the stochastic dynamic programming utility maximization problem of the individual is solved numerically, since analytical solutions are infeasible when the individual is maximizing utility over consumption and leisure, given non-linear marginal utility. We show how such a model captures changes in labor supply over the life cycle and that simulated consumption and wealth accumulation paths are consistent with empirical evidence. We also present a model of endogenously determined annuities in a consumption/saving framework under capital uncertainty and in the presence of bequest motives.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Benitez-Silva & John Rust & Gunter Hitsch & Giorgio Pauletto & George Hall, 2000. "A Comparison Of Discrete And Parametric Methods For Continuous-State Dynamic Programming Problems," Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 24, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/cef00/papers/paper24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guofang Huang & Hong Luo & Jing Xia, 2019. "Invest in Information or Wing It? A Model of Dynamic Pricing with Seller Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(12), pages 5556-5583, December.
    2. Aguirregabiria, Victor & Mira, Pedro, 2010. "Dynamic discrete choice structural models: A survey," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 156(1), pages 38-67, May.
    3. George Hall and John Rust, Yale University, 2001. "Econometric Methods for Endogenously Sampled Time Series: The Case of Commodity Price Speculation in the Steel Market," Computing in Economics and Finance 2001 274, Society for Computational Economics.
    4. Aruoba, S. Boragan & Fernandez-Villaverde, Jesus & Rubio-Ramirez, Juan F., 2006. "Comparing solution methods for dynamic equilibrium economies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 2477-2508, December.
    5. Harikesh Nair, 2007. "Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 239-292, September.
    6. Stephen P. Ryan & Mar Reguant & Meredith Fowlie, 2011. "Pollution Permits and the Evolution of Market Structure," 2011 Meeting Papers 1440, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    7. Hugo Benitez-Silva, 2000. "A Dynamic Model of Labor Supply, Consumption/Saving, and Annuity Decisions under Uncertainty," Department of Economics Working Papers 00-06, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.
    8. Peter Arcidiacono & Patrick Bayer & Federico A. Bugni & Jonathan James, 2012. "Approximating High-Dimensional Dynamic Models: Sieve Value Function Iteration," NBER Working Papers 17890, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Karun Adusumilli & Friedrich Geiecke & Claudio Schilter, 2019. "Dynamically Optimal Treatment Allocation using Reinforcement Learning," Papers 1904.01047, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    10. Chan, Tat Y. & Narasimhan, Chakravarthi & Yoon, Yeujun, 2017. "Advertising and price competition in a manufacturer-retailer channel," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 694-716.
    11. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde & Isaiah J. Hull, 2023. "Dynamic Programming on a Quantum Annealer: Solving the RBC Model," NBER Working Papers 31326, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Hugo Benitez-Silva, 2001. "A Dynamic Model of Job Search Behavior over the Life Cycle with Empirical Applications," Computing in Economics and Finance 2001 100, Society for Computational Economics.
    13. Karun Adusumilli & Dita Eckardt, 2019. "Temporal-Difference estimation of dynamic discrete choice models," Papers 1912.09509, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    14. Thierry Magnac & Pierre Dubois, 2016. "Consumer Demand with Unobserved Stockpiling and Intertemporal Price Discrimination," 2016 Meeting Papers 451, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    15. Mariacristina Rossi & Dario Sansone, 2018. "Precautionary savings and the self-employed," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 105-127, June.
    16. Ribeiro, Ricardo, 2010. "Consumer demand for variety: intertemporal effects of consumption, product switching and pricing policies," MPRA Paper 25812, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Igal Hendel & Aviv Nevo, 2006. "Measuring the Implications of Sales and Consumer Inventory Behavior," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(6), pages 1637-1673, November.
    18. Thomas H. Jørgensen & Maxime Tô, 2020. "Robust Estimation of Finite Horizon Dynamic Economic Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 499-509, February.
    19. Jean-Pierre Dubé & Günter Hitsch & Puneet Manchanda, 2005. "An Empirical Model of Advertising Dynamics," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 107-144, June.
    20. Gamba, Andrea & Tesser, Matteo, 2009. "Structural estimation of real options models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 798-816, April.
    21. Manuel Santos & John Rust, "undated". "Convergence Properties of Policy Iteration," Working Papers 2133377, Department of Economics, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University.
    22. Hugo Benítez-Silva, 2003. "The Annuity Puzzle Revisited," Working Papers wp055, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sceeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.