In his wide ranging attempt to review the literature on economic development and welfare in relation to the environment, Lomborg claims balance and objectivity, but actually presents a thoroughly misleading picture of environmental prospects and research, global economic development, and the real determinants of human welfare. Statistician Lomborg blatantly distorts the evidence by systematically selecting statistics to support his claims that global welfare is generally improving and environmental policy is unnecessary, while denying catastrophic risks such as prolonged drought in major food growing areas (though such events cannot be ruled out by climate models). In spite of its numerous errors and biases, "the Lomborg scam" (as leading biologist E.O.Wilson aptly calls it) has been welcomed by gullible or like- minded journalists and politicians.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Length: Date of creation: Dec 2002 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:san:wpecon:0204
Contact details of provider: Postal: School of Economics and Finance, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL Phone: 01334 462420 Fax: 01334 462444 Web page: http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/economics/
Order Information: Email:
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Peter Macmillan).
Find related papers by JEL classification: Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare and Poverty
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: