Under a constitution, which establishes a state under the rule of law, violations of unconstitutional laws are not punished. We argue that this is the true strength of the constitution. In our model, citizens decide on whether or not to evade taxes. For this they have to infer their probability of getting fined. The belief that - after the government defected once - a switch back to the constitution occurs is shown to be self-fulfilling in a game with imperfectly observable reliability of the government. We show that this prospect can deter even an unwilling government from defecting at the outset.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Research into Industry, Enterprise, Finance and the Firm in its series CRIEFF Discussion Papers with number
0113.
Find related papers by JEL classification: K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Carlsson, Hans & van Damme, Eric, 1993.
"Global Games and Equilibrium Selection,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 61(5), pages 989-1018, September.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: