This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Aid and Corruption: Do Donors Use Development Assistance to Provide the Right Incentives?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
ISOPI ALESSIA
MATTESINI FABRIZIO

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the determinants of the relationship between aid and corruption. We propose a static principal-agent model where a donor faces the problem of giving aid to a recipient country in which the phenomenon of corruption is widely spread. We distinguish among two different types of corruption: one, labeled endemic, that depends on the political and institutional environment of the recipient and that donors feel they can hardly affect from the outside; the other, labeled aid dependent, that is the consequence of moral hazard arising from the ability of corrupt burocracies to divert resources from their intended use. Designing contracts that can induce the right incentives, donors can act on the second type of corruption, contributing to reduce the entity of the phenomenon. We use the restrictions implied by our theoretical framework to test a model of aid allocation. Only for three countries (UK, Norway and Spain), we find some clear indication that efficiency consideration are taken into account in allocating aid. For the other donors, aid allocation depends on a mix of altruistic motives and strategic/economic interests with, however, a prevalence of the latter over the first.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: ftp://160.80.46.20/RePEc/papers/266.zip
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Tor Vergata University, CEIS in its series Departmental Working Papers with number 266.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Jan 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:rtv:ceiswp:266

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Via Columbia, 2 00133 Roma
Phone: 0039 06 2040234
Fax: 0039 06 2020687
Email:
Web page: http://www.ceistorvergata.it
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Svensson, Jakob, 2000. "Foreign aid and rent-seeking," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 437-461, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Heckman, James J, 1979. "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(1), pages 153-61, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Fudenberg, Drew & Tirole, Jean, 1990. "Moral Hazard and Renegotiation in Agency Contracts," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 58(6), pages 1279-1319, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. Mauro, Paolo, 1995. "Corruption and Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 110(3), pages 681-712, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Dollar, David & Levin, Victoria, 2004. "Increasing selectivity of foreign aid, 1984-2002," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3299, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  6. Isopi Alessia & Mattesini Fabbrizio, 2006. "Should Aid Reward Good Outcomes? Optimal Contracts in a Repeated Moral Hazard Model of Foreign Aid Allocation," Departmental Working Papers 236, Tor Vergata University, CEIS. [Downloadable!]
  7. McGillivray, Mark, 2004. "Descriptive and prescriptive analyses of aid allocation: Approaches, issues, and consequences," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 275-292. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Berthelemy, Jean-Claude & Tichit, Ariane, 2002. "Bilateral Donors' Aid Allocation Decisions: A Three-dimensional Panel Analysis," Working Papers UNU-WIDER Research Paper , World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  9. Mcgillivray, M. & White, H., 1993. "Explanatory studies of aid allocation among developing countries : a critical survey," Working Papers - General Series 148, Institute of Social Studies. [Downloadable!]
  10. Alberto Alesina & Beatrice Weder, 2002. "Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(4), pages 1126-1137, September. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? To receive notification of recent additions to the database, subscribe to the free NEP reports.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-29.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.