Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Unlocking further potential in the National Cohort study (NaKo) through comparability with the German Socio-Economic Panel

Contents:

Author Info

  • Hannes Kröger
  • Jürgen Schupp
  • Johann Behrens

Abstract

Background: The National Cohort (NaKo) will be one of the largest cohort studies in Europe to include intensive physical examinations and extensive information about the socio-demographic background and behavior of the subjects. However, regional selectivity of the study and potential learning effects due to the panel structure of the data present challenges for researchers using it. Methods: We discuss the two problems and show how they might lead to potential biases when trying to obtain results from the National Cohort that are representative for the total population of Germany. We suggest that the long-running German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) should be used as a reference data set for population means and as a control sample for detection of learning effects (“panel effects”) induced by information about the results of individual medical examinations.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://ratswd.de/dl/RatSWD_WP_237.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by German Council for Social and Economic Data (RatSWD) in its series Working Paper Series of the German Council for Social and Economic Data with number 237.

as in new window
Length: 16
Date of creation: 2014
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps237

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.ratswd.de/eng/index.html
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: ratswd; ratswd working paper; National Cohort; NaKo; German Socio-Economic Panel Study; SOEP; survey; study design; health surveys;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RatSWD) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask RatSWD to update the entry or send us the correct address.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.