Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Fiscal federalism, local public works and corruption

Contents:

Author Info

  • Martin Besfamille

Abstract

In ¯fiscal federal systems, local public works that generate spillovers are often ¯nanced by transfers from higher levels of government. In this article, we consider a governmental hierarchy composed by a Federal and a Local Government. The former delegates to the latter the task of ¯nding a ¯rm to undertake a local public work. As the Local Government has more information about the e±ciency of the firm, it communicates its private information to the Federal Government which decides the way to fund the project. If side-contracts between the local authority and the ¯rm in charge with constructing the project are feasible, di®erent stakes for collusion may arise. The Local Government can overstate the e±ciency of the ¯rm to obtain extra rents or can also understate it, to ensure the e®ective undertaking of the project. In order to ¯nd the optimal allocations, we derive a \Collusion-Proofness" property which states that, in order to maximize its expected welfare, the Federal Government can restrict to o®er collusion-proof contracts. These contracts indicate the transfers between the Federal Government, the local authority and the ¯rm of constructors. Finally we characterize the distortions set to attenuate the resulting implementation costs. They concern the cost of the project and the decision about its e®ective undertaking. The most important result of this article is that the undertaking of useless projects, at an in°ated cost, is an optimal response of the Federal Government to the threat of collusion between the local authorities and the firm of constructors.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www2.ulg.ac.be/crepp/papers/crepp-wp200001.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Centre de Recherche en Economie Publique et de la Population (CREPP) (Research Center on Public and Population Economics) HEC-Management School, University of Liège in its series CREPP Working Papers with number 0001.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:rpp:wpaper:0001

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Boulevard du Rectorat, 7, Batiment 31, boite 39, 4000 Liege
Phone: + 32 (0) 4 366 31 08
Fax: + 32 (0) 4 366 31 06
Web page: http://www2.ulg.ac.be/crepp/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rpp:wpaper:0001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mathieu Lefebvre).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.