IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/sphedp/2011_330.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Perspective Over Love For Transfer. From “The Logic Of Soup With Arguments Of Balls” To The Contemporary Vision In Psychoanalysis

Author

Listed:
  • Marin, Corina Mihaela

    (Universitatea Titu Maiorescu)

Abstract

A View on Transference Love – from “soup with dumplings as arguments” to contemporary perspectives In this paper I wanted to talk about the transference love, starting from Freud's work, written in 1915, but to handle it through the contemporary i prospective, brought to us by authors like M. Gill, O. Kernberg, Mertens or Kächele. M. Gill says about Freud’s „Observations on Transference-Love” that can be understood in terms of the issue of whether analysis is, a one-person or a two-person psychology. If the analysand is seen as a closed system of forces and counterforces, the perspective is one-persone. If the analytic situation is seen as a relationship between two people, the perspective is two-person and the analyst is a participant. Psychoanalysis, in its whole, is living today in integration while different schools are trying to impose their narrow points of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Marin, Corina Mihaela, 2011. "A Perspective Over Love For Transfer. From “The Logic Of Soup With Arguments Of Balls” To The Contemporary Vision In Psychoanalysis," Papers 2011/330, Osterreichish-Rumanischer Akademischer Verein.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:sphedp:2011_330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mihaicovaci.intercer.org/site/37/images/2010_UTM_pdf.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    psychology;

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:sphedp:2011_330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brindusa Covaci (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffuspro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.