IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/smuesw/2016_009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Competition and Gains from Trade: A Quantitative Analysis of China Between 1995 and 2004

Author

Listed:
  • Hsu, Wen-Tai

    (School of Economics, Singapore Management University)

  • Lu, Yi

    (National Singapore of Singapore)

  • Wu, Guiying Laura

    (Nanyang Techonological University)

Abstract

This paper provides a quantitative analysis of gains from trade for China over the period of 1995-2004, which was when China's openness drastically improved. We decompose gains from trade in two ways. First, we disentangle pro-competitive effects from a traditional Ricardian effect. Second, we separate the effect due to tariff reductions from that due to reductions in non-tariff trade costs. Our quantitative analysis shows that the pro-competitive effects account for 25.4% of the total welfare gains from trade, whereas the allocative efficiency alone accounts for 22.3%. We also find that tariff reductions account for about 31.6% of reductions of overall trade costs, whereas the associated relative contribution to overall gains is slightly larger at 39.6%. In our multi-sector analysis, we find that when a sectoral markup is higher in 1995, there tends to be a larger reduction in the respective sectoral trade cost between 1995 and 2004, a tendency that is generally welfare improving. One methodological advantage of this paper's quantitative framework is that its application is not constrained by industrial or product classifications, and so it can be applied to countries of any size.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsu, Wen-Tai & Lu, Yi & Wu, Guiying Laura, 2016. "Competition and Gains from Trade: A Quantitative Analysis of China Between 1995 and 2004," Economics and Statistics Working Papers 9-2016, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:smuesw:2016_009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2777&context=soe_research
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:smuesw:2016_009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cheong Pei Qi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sesmusg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.