Some Reflections On Current Debates In Impact Evaluation
AbstractA debate on approaches to impact evaluation has raged in development circles in recent years. This note gives some reflections on this debate through discussion of four issues. First, it is pointed out that there are two definitions of impact evaluation. Neither one is right or wrong, but they refer to completely different things. There is no point in methodological debates unless they agree a common starting point. Second, there is confusion between counterfactuals, which are implied by the definition of impact evaluation adopted in this paper, and control groups, which are not always necessary to construct a counterfactual. Third, calls for addressing contribution rather than attribution are also definitional, mistaking claims of attribution to mean sole attribution, which is does not. I then consider accusations of being 'positivist' and 'linear', which are, respectively, correct and unclear. Finally, these arguments do not mean that there is a hierarchy of methods, rather that quantitative approaches, including RCTs, are often the best available methods, having the added advantage of allowing analysis of cost effectiveness.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie) in its series 3ie Publications with number 2009-1.
Length: 16 pages
Date of creation: 01 Apr 2009
Date of revision:
attribution; counterfactual; impact evaluation;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2009-08-22 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Gluschenko, Konstantin, 2011.
"Оценка Эффективности Транспортных Проектов: Опыт И Проблемы
[Transport project appraisal: Experience and problems]," MPRA Paper 34096, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- World Bank, 2011. "Measuring Changes in Client Lives through Microfinance : Contributions of Different Approaches," World Bank Other Operational Studies 9452, The World Bank.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rajesh Sharma).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.