Moving Beyond Concentrations: The Challenge of Limiting Temperature Change
AbstractThe UN Framework Convention on Climate Change shifted the attention of the policy community from stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions to stabilizing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. While this represents a step forward, it does not go far enough. We find that, given the uncertainty in the climate system, focusing on atmospheric concentrations is likely to convey a false sense of precision. The causal chain between human activity and impacts is laden with uncertainty. From a benefit-cost perspective, it would be desirable to minimize the sum of mitigation costs and damages. Unfortunately, our ability to quantify and value impacts is limited. For the time being, we must rely on a surrogate. Focusing on temperature rather than on concentrations provides much more information on what constitutes an ample margin of safety. Concentrations mask too many uncertainties that are crucial for policy making.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Regulation2point0 in its series Working paper with number 531.
Date of creation: Apr 2004
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://regulation2point0.org/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Sheila M. Olmstead & Robert N. Stavins, 2006.
"An International Policy Architecture for the Post-Kyoto Era,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 96(2), pages 35-38, May.
- Olmstead, Sheila M. & Stavins, Robert N., 2006. "An International Policy Architecture for the Post-Kyoto Era," Working paper 353, Regulation2point0.
- Stavins, Robert, 2004.
"Can an Effective Global Climate Treaty Be Based on Sound Science, Rational Economics, and Pragmatic Politics?,"
dp-04-28, Resources For the Future.
- Stavins, Robert, 2004. "Can an Effective Global Climate Treaty be Based on Sound Science, Rational Economics, and Pragmatic Politics?," Working Paper Series rwp04-020, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
- Stavins, Robert N., 2004. "Can an Effective Global Climate Treaty be Based on Sound Science, Rational Economics, and Pragmatic Politics?," Working paper 99, Regulation2point0.
- Crost, Benjamin & Traeger, Christian P., 2010.
"Risk and aversion in the integrated assessment of climate change,"
CUDARE Working Paper Series
1104R, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy, revised Jul 2011.
- Crost, Benjamin & Traeger, Christian P., 2011. "Risk and aversion in the integrated assessment of climate change," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt1562s275, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
- Bosetti, Valentina & Buchner, Barbara, 2009. "Data Envelopment Analysis of different climate policy scenarios," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1340-1354, March.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Archive Maintainer).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.