Saving Lives: A Review of the Record
AbstractI present evidence on the cost-effectiveness of 76 regulatory actions promulgated by the Federal government from 1967 to 2001 by updating similar work published by the author in 1986. The paper first responds to several critiques of the original article recently published in prominent law journals by showing that most of the specific criticism is based on misrepresentations and mistakes. Wide differences in cost-effectiveness indicate we could save lives more effectively. Regulations aimed at reducing safety and cardiovascular risks have been more cost-effective than regulations aimed at reducing cancer risks. I suggest several potential regulations that could save lives more cost-effectively than the vast majority of regulations issued to date. Key words: mortality risks, value of life, cost-effectiveness, regulation
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Regulation2point0 in its series Working paper with number 188.
Date of creation: Jul 2003
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://regulation2point0.org/
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Toman, Michael & Farrow, Scott, 1998. "Using Environmental Benefit-Cost Analysis to Improve Government Performance," Discussion Papers dp-99-11, Resources For the Future.
- Farrow, Scott, 2001. "Improving Regulatory Performance: Does Executive Office Oversight Matter?," Working paper 77, Regulation2point0.
- Hahn, Robert W., 1999. "Regulatory Reform: Assessing the Government's Numbers," Working paper 268, Regulation2point0.
- Robert W. Hahn & Paul C. Tetlock, 2008. "Has Economic Analysis Improved Regulatory Decisions?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 67-84, Winter.
- Stavins, Robert, 2003.
"Environmental Protection and Economic Well-Being: How Does (and How Should) Government Balance These Two Important Values?,"
Working Paper Series
rwp03-035, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
- Stavins, Robert, 2003. "Environmental Protection and Economic Well-Being: How Does (and How Should)Government Balance These Two Important Values?," Discussion Papers dp-03-48, Resources For the Future.
- Jens Ludwig & Dave E. Marcotte, 2005. "Anti-depressants, suicide, and drug regulation," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 249-272.
- Scott Farrow, 2012. "Evaluating Central Regulatory Institutions with an Application to the U.S. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs," UMBC Economics Department Working Papers 12-01, UMBC Department of Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Archive Maintainer).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.