The Economics of CAFE Reconsidered: A Response to CAFE Critics and A Case for Fuel Economy Standards
AbstractEconomists have long criticized the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards as distortionary and costly ways to conserve fuel. Two recent analyses from the AEI-Brookings Joint Center argue that the costs of increasing the CAFE standards more than offset the modest conservation benefits.David Gerard and Lester Lavereview these studies and find that the cost estimates reflect pervasive problems with U.S. transportation policies. Specifically, the analyses estimate that externalities associated with safety, congestion, air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and national security range from eight to more than 10.4 cents per mile or more. Internalizing these existing distortions via a gasoline tax would more than double U.S. gasoline prices, which would reduce distortions in the product market and sharply reduce driving externalities. Thus,the authorsconclude that indictments of the CAFE program are actually arguments for sharp increases in gasoline taxes and other transportation policy reforms. Next,Gerard and Laverevisit the economic logic of minimum government fuel economy standards.They show that even rational, well-informed consumers will choose vehicles with fuel economies that are inconsistent with social preferences for fuel conservation. Therefore, there is a case for the CAFE standards even if existing problems with the transportation system are addressed.The authorsconclude that the CAFE critics have made a good case for increasing the gasoline tax $1.50 per gallon or more, but that they have not made a compelling argument against the CAFE program itself.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Regulation2point0 in its series Working paper with number 139.
Date of creation: Oct 2003
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://regulation2point0.org/
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Aaron S. Edlin, 1999.
"Per-Mile Premiums for Auto Insurance,"
Law and Economics
- Aaron S. Edlin, 2003. "Per-Mile Premiums for Auto Insurance," Law and Economics 0303001, EconWPA.
- Aaron S. Edlin., 1999. "Per-Mile Premiums for Auto Insurance," Economics Working Papers 99-262, University of California at Berkeley.
- Aaron S. Edlin, 1999. "Per-Mile Premiums for Auto Insurance," NBER Working Papers 6934, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Greene, David L, 1998. "Why CAFE worked," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(8), pages 595-613, July.
- Plotkin, Steven E., 2009. "Examining fuel economy and carbon standards for light vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 3843-3853, October.
- Shiau, Ching-Shin Norman & Michalek, Jeremy J. & Hendrickson, Chris T., 2009. "A structural analysis of vehicle design responses to Corporate Average Fuel Economy policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(9-10), pages 814-828, November.
- Parry, Ian & Fischer, Carolyn & Harrington, Winston, 2004. "Should Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards Be Tightened?," Discussion Papers dp-04-53, Resources For the Future.
- Maksim Belenkiy & Stefan Osborne, 2012. "The Effect of Changes in World Crude Oil Prices on U.S. Automobile Exports," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 2(3), pages 147-158.
- Kleit, Andrew N. & Lutter, Randall, 2004. "Increasing CAFE Standards: Still a Very Bad Idea," Working paper 366, Regulation2point0.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Archive Maintainer).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.