IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed017/1273.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Declining Dynamism at the Establishment Level

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Willis

    (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City)

  • John Haltiwanger

    (University of Maryland)

  • Russell Cooper

    (Penn State University)

Abstract

Recent papers have documented a decline in indicators of business dynamism (e.g., job reallocation) over time in the U.S. along with declining entrepreneurship. This decline in both dynamism and entrepreneurship has accelerated in the post 2000 period. In addition to the decline in the startup rate for new firms, there has been a substantial decline in the dispersion of firm and establishment growth rates over time for existing firms/establishments. Decker et. al (2016) undertake an empirical decomposition that concludes that the decline is dynamism is not due to a reduction in the dispersion of idiosyncratic productivity shocks. They find empirically that the decline is not a result of businesses facing a reduced dispersion of idiosyncratic shocks, but rather the businesses are not responding to those shocks as much as before. This paper aims to develop a model that can account for the observed changes in dynamism among existing establishments. The paper builds upon the framework in Cooper and Haltiwanger (2006) in which frictions associated with adjustment costs of labor interact with idiosyncratic productivity shocks and have strong implications for the empirical moments documented above. Using the lens of the structural model, implied changed in adjustment costs parameters can be estimated in order to evaluate the productivity losses from changes in frictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Willis & John Haltiwanger & Russell Cooper, 2017. "Declining Dynamism at the Establishment Level," 2017 Meeting Papers 1273, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed017:1273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://red-files-public.s3.amazonaws.com/meetpapers/2017/paper_1273.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed017:1273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.