IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed010/739.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Micro Frictions and Macro Wedges

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence Ales

    (Carnegie Mellon University - Tepper School of Business)

  • Nicolas Petrosky-Nadeau

    (Carnegie Mellon University - Tepper School of Business)

Abstract

Business Cycle Accounting (BCA) is a helpful litmus test for quantitive macroeconomic models. Indeed, deviations from the data and a neo-classical growth model can be summarized as distortion of the efficiency of production or to optimality conditions such as leisure-consumption choices and investment Euler equations. These empirical "wedges" are then a simple diagnostic test for the empirical plausibility of aggregate economic models of short-run fluctuations. However, the methodology is not able to distinguish between disaggregated models that imply the same aggregate wedges, each with very different implications for policy prescriptions and ability to be consistent with disaggregated data. In order to illustrate the restrictions of the BCA approach we first show under what conditions disaggregate environments map into single aggregate wedges. We then provide a specific example in which financial frictions drive variations in the extensive margin of labor, creating an aggregate labor wedge by altering the aggregation of both the household and production sides of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence Ales & Nicolas Petrosky-Nadeau, 2010. "Micro Frictions and Macro Wedges," 2010 Meeting Papers 739, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed010:739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://red-files-public.s3.amazonaws.com/meetpapers/2010/paper_739.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed010:739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.