Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Taxation of Human Capital and Cross-Country Trends in Wage Inequality


Author Info

  • Serdar Ozkan

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Burhanettin Kuruscu

    (University of Texas at Austin)

  • Fatih Guvenen

    (University of Minnesota and NBER)


Since the 1980's, wage inequality has increased substantially in the U.S. and U.K while changing little in most of continential European countries (CEU). This paper studies the effects of differences in labor income tax policies between US-UK and CEU for these trends. We begin by documenting three new empirical facts. First, we show that countries with a more progressive labor income tax schedule have significantly lower before-tax wage inequality at a point in time. Second, progressivity is also negatively correlated with the rise of wage inequality over time. Third, and finally, countries that experienced the smallest rise (or largest fall) in labor hours also had the smallest rise in wage inequality. We next construct a life-cycle model in which individuals decide each period whether to go to school, to work, or to be unemployed. Individuals can accumulate skills either in school or while working. Wage inequality arises from differences across individuals in their ability to learn new skills as well as from idiosyncratic shocks to human capital. In this framework, progressive taxation compresses the wage structure, thereby distorting the incentives to accumulate human capital, in turn reducing the cross-sectional dispersion of wages. When this economy experiences skill-biased technical change, progressivity dampens the rise in wage dispersion over time. Furthermore, these effects of progressivity are compounded by differences in average labor income tax rates: the higher taxes in the CEU reduces labor supply (and the benefit of human capital investments), further muting the response to SBTC. Consequently, as in the data, countries with higher average taxes and/or progressivity experience a larger fall in hours and a smaller rise in inequality. We estimate that differences in tax policies can account for 2/3 of the difference in the level and rise in wage inequality between US-UK and the CEU since 1980.

Download Info

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Society for Economic Dynamics in its series 2009 Meeting Papers with number 1170.

as in new window
Date of creation: 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:red:sed009:1170

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Society for Economic Dynamics Christian Zimmermann Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis PO Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
Fax: 1-314-444-8731
Web page:
More information through EDIRC

Related research



No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Fatih Guvenen & Burhanettin Kuruscu, 2010. "A Quantitative Analysis of the Evolution of the U.S. Wage Distribution, 1970-2000," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2009, Volume 24, pages 227-276 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed009:1170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.