Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Learning your Earning: Are Labor Income Shocks Really That Persistent?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Fatih Guvenen

Abstract

In this paper we examine the risk situation facing individuals in the labor market. The current consensus in the literature is that the labor income process has a large random walk component. We argue two points. First, the direct estimates of this parameter (from labor income data) appear to be upward biased due to the omission of heterogeneity in income profiles across the population that would be implied, for example, by a human capital model with heterogeneity. When we allow for differences in profiles, the estimated persistence falls from 0.99 to about 0.8. Moreover, the main evidence against profile heterogeneity in the existing literature---that the autocorrelations of income changes are small and typically negative---is in fact also replicated by the profile heterogeneity model we estimate, casting doubt on the previous interpretation of this evidence. Second, we embed this process in a life-cycle model to examine how it alters the consumption-saving decision of individuals. We assume that---as seems plausible---individuals do not know their profiles exactly at the beginning of life, but learn in a Bayesian way with successive income observations. We find that learning is very slow and affects consumption choice throughout the life-cycle. The model generates substantial rise in consumption inequality over the life-cycle, which matches empirical observations (Deaton and Paxson 1994). Moreover, the shape of the age-inequality profile is non-concave as in the data, but unlike in a model with very persistent shocks. Finally, the consumption profiles of college graduates are steeper than high-school graduates in the model consistent with the data because they face a wider dispersion of, and hence uncertainty about, income growth rates. Overall this evidence indicates that income shocks may be significantly less persistent than what is currently assumed.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.econ.rochester.edu/guvenen/LABRISK2004.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Christian Zimmermann)
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Society for Economic Dynamics in its series 2004 Meeting Papers with number 177.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:red:sed004:177

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Society for Economic Dynamics Christian Zimmermann Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis PO Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
Fax: 1-314-444-8731
Email:
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/society.htm
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: earnings process; idiosyncratic shocks; learning; inequality;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed004:177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.