Ex-Post Implications Of Ex-Ante Data Acquisition Strategies In Multiagent-Type Urban Freight Policy Evaluation
AbstractData quality plays a relevant role in policy evaluation. Data quality is also strictly linked to questionnaire development and administration strategies. Willingness to pay estimates might be influenced by the data acquisition method adopted if an ex-post sophisticated modelling cannot compensate for the low quality data acquired. We test this hypothesis by comparing agent-generic vs. agent-specific data acquisition. This methodologically relevant question is investigated with respect to urban freight transport policy evaluation. In this field, in fact, heterogeneity among stakeholders' (i.e. retailers and transport providers) preferences is allegedly important since retailers, demanding freight transportation services, and transport providers, offering them, are characterised by, structurally and functionally motivated, differences in preferences. Results indicate that agent-specific data acquisition should be adopted. The analyst ought to take the longer data acquisition route when a strong and well rooted a priori knowledge suggests different agent-types' preferences are at work. This reflections are particularly valuable given ex-post agent-specific modelling cannot compensate for ex-ante agent-generic data acquisition procedure. Once perpetrated, the original sin cannot be redeemed.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by CREI Università degli Studi Roma Tre in its series Working Papers with number 0613.
Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: 2013
Date of revision: 2013
Urban freight transport; policy evaluation; experimental design; data acquisition; willingness to pay; agent-specific.;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2013-11-16 (All new papers)
- NEP-TRE-2013-11-16 (Transport Economics)
- NEP-URE-2013-11-16 (Urban & Real Estate Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Julian Allen & Michael Browne & Tom Cherrett, 2012. "Survey Techniques in Urban Freight Transport Studies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 287-311, February.
- de Jong, Gerard & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2007. "A micro-simulation model of shipment size and transport chain choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 950-965, November.
- Simona Bolis & Rico Maggi, 2003. "Logistics Strategy and Transport Service Choices: An Adaptive Stated Preference Experiment," Growth and Change, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, vol. 34(4), pages 490-504.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Francesca Vaino).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.