Market Reform, Regional Energy and Popular Representation: Evidence from Post-Soviet Russia
AbstractThis article investigates the relative impact of regional energy production on the energy voting choices of State Duma deputies between 1994 and 2003, controlling for other factors such as party affiliation, electoral mandate, committee membership and socio-demographic parameters. We apply Poole’s optimal classification method of roll call votes using an ordered probit model to explain energy market reform in the first decade of Russia’s democratic transition. Our main finding is that the gas production factor is inter temporally important in the formation of the deputies’ legislative choices and shows Gazprom’s strategic position in the post-Soviet Russian economy. The oil production factor is variably significant in the two first Dumas, when the main legislative debates on oil privatization occur. The energy committee membership tends to consistently explain pro-reform voting choices. The pro-and anti-reform poles observed in our Poole-based single dimensional scale are not necessarily connected with liberal and state-oriented policies respectively.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology in its series School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series with number 221.
Date of creation: 28 Jun 2007
Date of revision:
Note: Theocharis N. Grigoriadis, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO), Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Prospect Vernadskogo 76, 119454, Moscow, Russia, and The Delegation of the European Commission to the Russian Federation, Economic, Trade and Agriculture Section, Kadashevskaya Nab. 14/1, 119017, Moscow, Russia, email: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org; Benno Torgler, The School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia, CREMA Centre for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Switzerland, and CESifo Munich, email: email@example.com. For helpful comments and suggestions, thanks are due to Fuad Aleskerov, Keith T. Poole, and Thomas Remington. We would also like to thank the Moscow-based INDEM Foundation for the generous provision of the roll call data. Please address all correspondence to Theocharis N. Grigoriadis.
Contact details of provider:
Postal: GPO Box 2434, BRISBANE QLD 4001
Web page: http://www.bus.qut.edu.au/faculty/economics/
More information through EDIRC
energy regulation; market reform; energy resources; roll call votes; legislative politics; State Duma; Russia;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
- D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
- P27 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Systems and Transition Economies - - - Performance and Prospects
- P37 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Legal
- P31 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions
- R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2007-07-07 (All new papers)
- NEP-CDM-2007-07-07 (Collective Decision-Making)
- NEP-DCM-2007-07-07 (Discrete Choice Models)
- NEP-ENE-2007-07-07 (Energy Economics)
- NEP-POL-2007-07-07 (Positive Political Economics)
- NEP-REG-2007-07-07 (Regulation)
- NEP-TRA-2007-07-07 (Transition Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Fleck, Robert K. & Kilby, Christopher & Fleck, Robert K., 2000.
"Reassessing the Role of Constituency in Congressional Voting,"
Vassar College Department of Economics Working Paper Series
51, Vassar College Department of Economics.
- Fleck, Robert K & Kilby, Christopher, 2002. " Reassessing the Role of Constituency in Congressional Voting," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 112(1-2), pages 31-53, July.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angela Fletcher).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.