IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/782.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Efficiency Effects of Discrete Tax Rate Changes Without Lump-Sum Taxes and Transfers

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Bruce

Abstract

An exact expression for the normalized change in utility resulting from discrete changes in tax rates on economic activities is derived using certain linearity assumptions in preferences. This expression is used to consider alternative ways of identifying the resulting efficiency cost (or excess burden) when lump-sum taxes and transfers are assumed to be unavailable to compensate for revenue changes. Benchmark tax structures other than lump-sum taxation, specifically Ramsey optimal and uniform tax structures, are used to identify the efficiency cost of revenue neutral tax changes. The results are used to explain and extend various known results on the efficiency effects of such tax changes as well as to make an efficiency case for avoiding arbitrary departures from uniformity even when lump-sum taxes are infeasible. Finally, the theoretical shortcomings of considering revenue neutral tax changes are considered and an alternative methodology is introduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Bruce, 1990. "The Efficiency Effects of Discrete Tax Rate Changes Without Lump-Sum Taxes and Transfers," Working Paper 782, Economics Department, Queen's University.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/working_papers/papers/qed_wp_782.pdf
    File Function: First version 1990
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robin Boadway, 2017. "Second-Best Theory: Ageing well at Sixty," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 249-270, May.
    2. Boadway, Robin, 1999. "Le rôle de la théorie de l’optimum du second rang en économie publique," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 75(1), pages 29-65, mars-juin.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.