The Dynastic Cycle and the Stationary State
AbstractChinese historians speak of dynastic cycles where periods of economic progress and decline coincide with the rise and fall of families of rulers, while economists speak of societies without technical change or involuntary unemployment as evolving into stationary states. This paper alters the usual assumptions of economic analysis to generate dynastic cycles. People are divided into three classes: farmers, thieves and rulers. Rulers act in their own interest in taxing farmers and hunting thieves. The risk of loss of life in combat has a major influence on population growth. The cycle is modelled as alternations between anarchy and despotism. Despotism collapses into anarchy when population becomes too large and income per head too small to support a ruling class.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Queen's University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 671.
Length: 30 pages
Date of creation: 1986
Date of revision:
Other versions of this item:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page. reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.