IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/548.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Simplified Version of a Differencing Specification Test

Author

Listed:
  • Russell Davidson
  • James G. MacKinnon

Abstract

In a recent paper, Plosser, Schwert and White (1982) proposed a general test for model misspecification based on a comparison of estimates of the model in levels and first-differences. We demonstrate that this test is equivalent to a certain F test for omitted variables. The latter test has several advantages over the former. For example, the new test is exact whenever F tests are exact, and it is easy to compute. As part of our proof, we demonstrate that many tests based on a comparison of ordinary least squares and instrumental variables estimators are equivalent to F tests, and that the OLS estimator based on first differences is equivalent to a certain instrumental variables estimator based on levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Russell Davidson & James G. MacKinnon, 1984. "A Simplified Version of a Differencing Specification Test," Working Paper 548, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    specification tests; differencing tests;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.