IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/192.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Aggregate Land Rents, Aggregate Transportation Costs and Expenditure on Public Goods

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Arnott
  • Joseph Stiglitz

Abstract

Using residential location theory, the authors investigate the relationship between three economic aggregates in the city -- aggregate land rents, aggregate transportation costs, and expenditure on public goods. Differences in land rents partially reflect differences in transportation cost, as has long been recognized. However, little work has been done on the relationship between aggregate land rents and aggregate transportation costs in the city. In a general model, the ratio of these two depend on the shape of the city, and on the transport cost function. The results suggest that partial equilibrium analysis often produces erroneous conclusions. In the absence of congestion, and where public goods are the only cause of urbanization, the Henry George theorem that aggregate land rents equal expenditure on the public good in a city of optimal population size holds.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Arnott & Joseph Stiglitz, 1975. "Aggregate Land Rents, Aggregate Transportation Costs and Expenditure on Public Goods," Working Paper 192, Economics Department, Queen's University.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hartwick, John M., 1979. "The Henry George Rule, Scale Economies and Optimal Land Use," Queen's Institute for Economic Research Discussion Papers 275147, Queen's University - Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.