In recent years, as longer time series of cross-sectional household surveys have become available, it has become possible to look at the consumption and saving behavior of birth cohorts in a number of developing and developed economies. The cohort evidence is singularly appropriate for the analysis of life-cycle models of consumption because, at least in its simpler forms, the life-cycle hypothesis (LCH) predicts that the cohort average of the logarithm of consumption in any year can be additively decomposed into a time-invariant cohort effect and an age effect, both of which can be readily recovered from the cohort data by linear regression on dummy variables. The results of these cohort level analyses have not been favorable for the LCH interpretation of the international correlation between growth and saving. According to this, higher rates of economic growth drive up rates of national saving by expanding the lifetime resources of younger generations, who are saving, relative to the lifetime resources of older generations, who are dissaving. While it is typically possible to interpret the cohort results in a way that is consistent with the LCH, it is a good deal harder to rescue the prediction that higher growth means higher national saving rates, or at least that the effect is large enough to be consistent with the international relationship in which a one percentage point increase in the rate of per capita growth is associated with a roughly two percentage point increase in the saving rate. In Section 1, we review existing cohort studies from a range of rich and poor countries, and also present new results for Indonesia. This evidence shows no strong negative relationship between saving rates and age, so that when higher growth redistributes lifetime resources towards the young, the effect on savings is modest, and in some cases even negative.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies. in its series Working Papers with number
225.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)