This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Street Children’s Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child: A study of acceptance and observance in Mexico and Ecuador

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Sarah Thomas de Benitez
Abstract

This paper offers a first template for assessing performance by national governments in guaranteeing disadvantaged groups of youngsters access to their rights, as enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). Street children, who are among the most severely disadvantaged children of any society, are the particular focus of this paper. The 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) constitutes a bold new approach to children’s rights, requiring governments to assume new commitments to helping street children. Latin America has a particularly strong history of work with street children, spanning at least 30 years, but governments have not managed to guarantee access by street children to their basic human rights. This paper explores CRC adherence with respect to street children in two Latin American countries – Mexico, a fairly affluent country and Ecuador, a relatively poor one. I divide my exploration of each country’s observance of the CRC into the broad fields of legislation, implementation and enforcement, and assess governmental progress in the decade since their ratification of the Convention. Findings are disappointing for both countries: they suggest that domestic legislation is still inadequate, and that neither government has implemented the policies or allocated the budgetary resources necessary to ensure that street children gain access to their rights. Regrettably, data collection, monitoring of implementation and measurement of outcomes, are all gravely inadequate for enforcement of CRC provisions in Mexico and Ecuador. The findings suggest that strong monitoring and enforcement mechanisms are required to counter existing disincentives for governments to invest in street children. Substantial improvements are needed, particularly in the field of enforcement, before street children in Mexico and Ecuador can gain consistent access to their basic human rights. The prospects for Ecuador’s street children are particularly bleak: the government will need considerable international support to be able to deliver on its commitments to street children under the CRC. Mexico has a more developed political economy and has made more progress than Ecuador; the Mexican government is in a position to make substantial advances toward guaranteeing street children their rights as provided by the CRC.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://crcw.princeton.edu/workingpapers/WP00-01-DeBenitez.pdf
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing. in its series Working Papers with number 984.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Feb 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:pri:crcwel:984

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Wallace Hall, Princeton NJ 08544-1013
Phone: (609) 258-1456
Fax: (609) 258-5974
Web page: http://crcw.princeton.edu/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (David Long).

Related research
Keywords:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Use the JEL tree to browse through the database by subfields.

This page was last updated on 2008-11-7.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.