Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Inequalities in income and inequalities in health


Author Info

  • Angus Deaton

    (Princeton University)


What is inequality in health? Are economists' standard tools for measuring income inequality relevant or useful for measuring it? Does income protect health and does income inequality pose a hazard to health? In this paper, I discuss two different concepts of health inequality and relate each of them to the literature on inequality in income. I propose a model of reference groups, in which each individual's health is related to his or her status within the group as measured by income relative to the group mean. In such a model, increases in income inequality, whether within groups, or between them, has no effect on average health. Even so, the slope of the relationship between health and measured income, the "gradient," depends on the ratio of between to within-group income inequality. The model is extended to allow income inequality to play a direct positive or negative role in determining health status. Empirical evidence on cross-country income inequality and life expectancy within the OECD, and on time-series evidence for the U.S., Britain, and Japan, provide little support for the idea that inequality is a health hazard at the national level. Data on birth cohorts for the US observed from 1981 to 1993 show no relationship between mortality and income inequality. However, there is a well defined health gradient in these data, and its slope increases with increases in each cohort's income inequality.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (David Long)
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing. in its series Working Papers with number 280.

as in new window
Date of creation: May 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:pri:cheawb:deaton_inequalities

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Robertson Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-1013
Phone: (609) 258-4800
Web page:
More information through EDIRC

Related research


Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:cheawb:deaton_inequalities. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (David Long).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.