Sherry Glied (Mailman School of Public Health) Adriana Lleras-Muney (Princeton University)
Abstract
Health inequalities across socio-economic groups in the US are large and have been growing. We hypothesize that, as in other, non-health contexts, this pattern occurs because more educated people are better able to take advantage of technological advances in medicine than are the less educated. We test this hypothesis by relating education gradients in mortality to a measure of medical innovation -- the number of active drug ingredients available to treat a disease. We use the Mortality Detail Files and SEER cancer data to estimate consistent causal effects of education on mortality, using compulsory schooling laws in the earlier part of the 20th century as our measure of education. We find that more educated individuals have a larger survival advantage in those diseases where there has been more medical progress. These effects are greater for more recent progress than for older progress, supporting the hypothesis that gradients emerge at the time of innovation.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing. in its series Working Papers with number
255.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (David Long).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)