Ideally, presidential elections should be decided based on how the candidates would handle issues facing the country. If so, knowledge about the voters’ perception of the candidates should help to forecast election outcomes. We make two forecasts of the winner of the popular vote in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. One is based on voters’ perceptions of how the candidates would deal with issues (problems facing the country) if elected. We show that this approach would have correctly picked the winner for seven out of nine elections from 1972 to 2004, along with providing an idea of the margin of victory. In addition, in predicting the two-party vote percentages for the last three elections from 1996 to 2004, the methods’ out-of-sample forecasts outperformed those derived from four well-established models. Based on this approach, we predict the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama, as the winner, obtaining 51.2% of the popular two-party vote. The other forecast is based on voters’ preference for policies and their perceptions of which policies the candidates are likely to pursue. It also predicts Obama to win the popular vote.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number
9829.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: