Review of the utilization of a Portuguese public hospital
AbstractThis paper reports on some important findings of a study conducted in Covilhã/ Portugal on appropriateness of hospital admission and in-hospital days in a Portuguese hospital using an adapted version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol – a review tool for hospital utilization. This analysis showed a significant rate of inappropriateness in admission (24, 6%) and days of stay (37, 4%) and it also suggested a low rate of use of the override options. It was possible to identify the conservative attitude as the most common cause of inappropriate admissions and days of stay. This study demonstrates that a high proportion of admissions and days of stay are related to patients who could have been attended at other levels of the health care system such as outpatient consultations. The analysis made it possible to identify and to explore some variables correlated to the levels of inappropriateness and to the causes of inappropriateness or levels of health care required by the patients.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 6160.
Date of creation: 2007
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in Acta Médica Portuguesa II.19(2006): pp. 381-386
Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP); hospital utilization; hospital admission; in-hospital days;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2007-12-15 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.