Hayek´s methodological outlook at the time he engaged in business cycle research was actually closer to praxeological apriorism than to Popperian falsificationism. A consideration of the Duhem thesis highlights the fact that even from a mainstream methodological perspective falsificationism is more problematic than is often realized. Even if the praxeological and mainstream lines of argumentation reject the Popperian emphasis on falsification for different reasons and from a different background, the prospects for falsificationism in economic methodology seem rather bleak.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number
6067.
Length: Date of creation: 2007 Date of revision: Publication status: Published in Procesos de Mercado - Revista Europea de Economía Política Primavera.IV Número 1(2007): pp. 57-78 Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:6067
Find related papers by JEL classification: E0 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: