This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The economics of a biofuel consumption mandate and excise-tax exemption: An empirical example of U.S. ethanol policy

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
de Gorter, Harry
Just, David R.

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper develops a general framework to evaluate the effects on agricultural and gasoline markets of a consumption mandate and excise-tax exemption, the two most prominent public biofuel policies. Although market prices for biofuels increase under each policy, consumer fuel prices always decline with a tax exemption and increase with a mandate except under special circumstances when oil supply is inelastic relative to the supply of biofuels. A tax exemption alone is a biofuel consumption subsidy but most of the benefits go to biofuel producers because biofuels are a small share of total fuel consumption. Fuel consumers benefit indirectly to the extent gasoline prices decline with increased biofuel production. With a binding mandate in place, the tax exemption acts as a subsidy to fuel consumers instead. Biofuel producers only gain indirectly with the increased biofuel demand resulting from the increase in total fuel consumption. Most of the market effects are due to the mandate with the tax exemption only exacerbating the biofuel price increase and causing an increase in the oil price but a decrease in the consumer fuel price. An important implication is that the effects of each policy are not additive when used in combination. To illustrate the complexity and importance of the interaction between biofuel mandates and tax exemptions, we calibrate a stylized empirical model of the U.S. ethanol market. The results confirm the theoretical findings, including the special case of a mandate reducing consumer prices. The model is well suited to form a basis for evaluating the social benefits of the mandate versus the tax exemption in reducing local pollution, global warming and reliance on oil, and in enhancing farm incomes, reducing tax costs of farm subsidies and promoting rural development.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/5503/
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 5503.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 24 Oct 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:5503

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).

Related research
Keywords: biofuels mandate tax exemption ethanol

Find related papers by JEL classification:
Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy
Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
F17 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Forecasting and Simulation

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? There are over 16000 authors registered on RePEc Author Service.

This page was last updated on 2008-8-19.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.