IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/54976.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Podejście umiarkowane w sporze o możliwość i użyteczność moralną kodyfikacji norm etycznych
[Moderate Position in the Debate on the Moral Possibility and Usefulness of Ethical Standards Codification]

Author

Listed:
  • Klimczuk, Andrzej

Abstract

Popularyzacja tworzenia kodeksów zaadresowanych do różnych grup społecznych jest jedną z cech współczesnego świata. Wśród badaczy tego zjawiska nie ma jednak pełnej zgody na zasadność i użyteczność moralną tej działalności. Artykuł przybliża przegląd literatury przedmiotu w zakresie dotyczącym argumentów za stworzeniem umiarkowanego stanowiska na rzecz kodyfikacji norm etycznych. Przybliżono główne pojęcia dotyczące kodeksów etycznych i stanowiska za ich przyjęciem i odrzuceniem. Zwrócono uwagę na sposoby zwiększania skuteczności kodeksów oraz procedurę podejmowania decyzji etycznych w sposób godzący podejścia zwolenników i przeciwników kodyfikacji. The popularisation of code elaboration addressed to various social groups is one of the features of the modern world. However, among researchers of this phenomenon a full consensus on the moral validity and usefulness of this activity does not exist. The article closely reviews the literature with regard to the reasons for the creation of a moderate position on the codification of ethical standards. The essay brings closer the main concepts of ethical codes and positions for their adoption and rejection. Attention is paid to ways of increasing the effectiveness of codes and the ethical decision-making procedure in a manner that undermines supporters and opponents of codification approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Klimczuk, Andrzej, 2014. "Podejście umiarkowane w sporze o możliwość i użyteczność moralną kodyfikacji norm etycznych [Moderate Position in the Debate on the Moral Possibility and Usefulness of Ethical Standards Codificatio," MPRA Paper 54976, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:54976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/54976/1/MPRA_paper_54976.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    etyka zawodowa; kodeksualizm; odpowiedzialność społeczna; regulacja zachowań; standaryzacja; sytuacjonizm; professional ethics; codification; social responsibility; regulation of behaviour; standardization; situationism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:54976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.