Veiled Waters: Examining the Jones Act's Consumer Welfare Effect
AbstractThis paper analyzes how The Jones Act, a maritime law that effectively closes the United States’ coastal shipping routes to foreign firms, impacts the economic welfare of domestic ocean transport consumers. Though it has long been speculated that the Act is economically detrimental to the United States, and some efforts to examine this have been made in the past, the data needed to facilitate precise estimates was not available until very recently. Using an original framework, I apply this new data in generating a better understanding of how the Jones Act’s trade restrictions translate into economic consequences. Section 1 frames the Act within its broader political-economic context and describes the motivation behind my question along with my approach to answering it. Section 2 describes the maritime shipping industry and the Jones Act’s place within it, while Section 3 addresses related findings from past research and how they impel this study. Section 4 details my methodology (along with corresponding economic intuition) and presents the thesis’ finding: that consumers of the domestic maritime transport would be significantly better off (on the order of more than $578 million/year, in monetary terms) if the Jones Act’s restrictions were not in place. Section 5 discusses the potential implications of this result for other sectors of the economy as well as for the direction of future public policy.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 51469.
Date of creation: 2013
Date of revision:
Maritime Economics; Jones Act; Cabotage; Transport Regulation;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
- L9 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2013-11-22 (All new papers)
- NEP-LAW-2013-11-22 (Law & Economics)
- NEP-TRE-2013-11-22 (Transport Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Joseph Francois & Hugh M. Arce & Kenneth A. Reinert & Joseph E. Flynn, 1996. "Commercial Policy and the Domestic Carrying Trade," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 181-98, February.
- Ying, John S, 1990. "The Inefficiency of Regulating a Competitive Industry: Productivity Gains in Trucking Following Reform," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 72(2), pages 191-201, May.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.