Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Some Further Evidence on the Behaviour of Stock Returns in India

Contents:

Author Info

  • Hiremath, Gourishankar S
  • Bandi, Kamaiah

Abstract

This paper examines the stock return behaviour in two premier Indian stock markets using Chow-Denning multiple variance ratio and Hinich bicorrelation tests. The former test overcomes size distortion of conventional variance ratio test. The latter test is capable of detecting linear and non-linear dependencies. The study is based on 14 indices relating to the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange (NSE), and relates to the period 02/06/1997 to 30/01/2009. The Chow-Denning test rejects the null of random walk for six indices. The Hinich test rejects the null of pure white noise for full sample period. However, the windowed test results of Hinich show that the serial dependencies are not consistent across the sample period for all indices. This indicates presence of episodic dependencies in stock returns surrounded by long periods of pure noise.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/48518/
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 48518.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 2010
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in International Journal of Economics and Finance 2.2(2010): pp. 157-167
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:48518

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Random walk; serial dependence variance ratios; bi-correlation; ; episodic dependencies; non-linearity; mean-reversion; pure noise; Indian Stock Market; NSE; BSE;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Andrew W. Lo, A. Craig MacKinlay, 1988. "Stock Market Prices do not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 41-66.
  2. Hoque, Hafiz A.A.B. & Kim, Jae H. & Pyun, Chong Soo, 2007. "A comparison of variance ratio tests of random walk: A case of Asian emerging stock markets," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 488-502.
  3. Thomas Lagoarde Segot & Brian M Lucey, 2005. "Stock Market Predictability in the MENA: Evidence from New Variance Ratio Tests and Technical Trade Analysis," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series, IIIS iiisdp92, IIIS.
  4. Pradeep K. Yadav & Krishna Paudyal & Peter F. Pope, 1999. "Non-linear Dependence in Stock Returns: Does Trading Frequency Matter?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5&6), pages 651-679.
  5. Hsieh, David A, 1991. " Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics: Application to Financial Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 46(5), pages 1839-77, December.
  6. Claudio Bonilla & Rafael Romero-Meza & Melvin Hinich, 2006. "Episodic nonlinearity in Latin American stock market indices," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 195-199.
  7. Ojah, Kalu & Karemera, David, 1999. "Random Walks and Market Efficiency Tests of Latin American Emerging Equity Markets: A Revisit," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 34(2), pages 57-72, May.
  8. Ayadi, O. Felix & Pyun, C. S., 1994. "An application of variance ratio test to the Korean securities market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 643-658, September.
  9. Richards, Anthony J., 1995. "Comovements in national stock market returns: Evidence of predictability, but not cointegration," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 631-654, December.
  10. Grieb, Terrance & Reyes, Mario G, 1999. "Random Walk Tests for Latin American Equity Indexes and Individual Firms," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 22(4), pages 371-83, Winter.
  11. Hyun-Jung Ryoo & Graham Smith, 2002. "Korean stock prices under price limits: variance ratio tests of random walks," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(8), pages 545-553.
  12. Hicham Benjelloun & Jay Squalli, 2008. "Do general indexes mask sectoral efficiencies?: A multiple variance ratio assessment of Middle Eastern equity markets," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 136-151, April.
  13. Graham Smith & Keith Jefferis & Hyun-Jung Ryoo, 2002. "African stock markets: multiple variance ratio tests of random walks," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(7), pages 475-484.
  14. Scheinkman, Jose A & LeBaron, Blake, 1989. "Nonlinear Dynamics and Stock Returns," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(3), pages 311-37, July.
  15. Kian-Ping Lim & Robert Brooks, 2009. "Are Chinese stock markets efficient? Further evidence from a battery of nonlinearity tests," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 147-155.
  16. Chow, K. Victor & Denning, Karen C., 1993. "A simple multiple variance ratio test," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 385-401, August.
  17. Ronald Balvers & Yangru Wu & Erik Gilliland, 2000. "Mean Reversion across National Stock Markets and Parametric Contrarian Investment Strategies," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 55(2), pages 745-772, 04.
  18. Abraham Abraham, 2002. "Testing the Random Walk Behavior and Efficiency of the Gulf Stock Markets," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 37(3), pages 469-480, 08.
  19. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1988. "Permanent and Temporary Components of Stock Prices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(2), pages 246-73, April.
  20. Pagan, Adrian, 1996. "The econometrics of financial markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 15-102, May.
  21. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
  22. James M. Poterba & Lawrence H. Summers, 1987. "Mean Reversion in Stock Prices: Evidence and Implications," NBER Working Papers 2343, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  23. Natividad Blasco & Cristina Del Rio & Rafael Santamaría, 1997. "The Random Walk Hypothesis in the Spanish Stock Market: 1980-1992," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 667-684.
  24. Lim, Kian-Ping & Brooks, Robert D. & Hinich, Melvin J., 2008. "Nonlinear serial dependence and the weak-form efficiency of Asian emerging stock markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 527-544, December.
  25. Graham Smith, 2007. "Random walks in Middle Eastern stock markets," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 587-596.
  26. Andrew Worthington & Helen Higgs, 2009. "Efficiency in the Australian stock market, 1875-2006: a note on extreme long-run random walk behaviour," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 301-306.
  27. French, Kenneth R. & Roll, Richard, 1986. "Stock return variances : The arrival of information and the reaction of traders," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 5-26, September.
  28. Osamah M. Al-Khazali & David K. Ding & Chong Soo Pyun, 2007. "A New Variance Ratio Test of Random Walk in Emerging Markets: A Revisit," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 42(2), pages 303-317, 05.
  29. José Carlos Dias & Luís Lopes & Vitor Martins & José Manuel Benzinho, 2004. "Efficiency tests in the Iberian stock markets," Finance, EconWPA 0406001, EconWPA.
  30. Hinich, Melvin J & Patterson, Douglas M, 1985. "Evidence of Nonlinearity in Daily Stock Returns," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 3(1), pages 69-77, January.
  31. Dahl, Christian M. & Nielsen, Steen, 2001. "The Random Walk Of Stock Prices: Implications Of Recent Nonpara-Metric Tests," Working Papers, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics 07-2001, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
  32. Lee, Cheng F & Chen, Gong-meng & Rui, Oliver M, 2001. "Stock Returns and Volatility on China's Stock Markets," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 24(4), pages 523-43, Winter.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:48518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.