We assess the biological basis of expected utility anomalies through an experiment of the Allais paradox. A questionnaire study of 120 subjects replicates the anomalies and further gathers information about the respondents’ bio-characteristics, such as gender, age, parenthood, handedness, second to fourth digit ratio, current emotional state, past negative experiences, and religiousness. We find that some of those bio-characteristics matter for the anomalies.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number
4520.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Newton Da Costa & Carlos Mineto & Sergio Da Silva, 2008.
"Disposition effect and gender,"
Applied Economics Letters,
Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 411-416.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Newton, Da Costa Jr & Carlos, Mineto & Sergio, Da Silva, 2006.
"Disposition effect and gender,"
MPRA Paper
1848, University Library of Munich, Germany.
[Downloadable!]
Aldo Rustichini & John Dickhaut & Paolo Ghirardato & Kip Smith & Jose V. Pardo, 2002.
"A brain imaging study of the choice procedure,"
CEEL Working Papers
0217, Computable and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
[Downloadable!]